2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsunami deposits in the geological record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
197
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(167 reference statements)
4
197
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…12b, c), in some cases several hundred of meters inland, overlying organic fine deposits in lagoons and estuaries. The 2010 deposits are similar to tsunami deposits as sand layers within peat and mud sediments in coastal environments as tidal marshes, back-barrier marshes and lagoons reported in other subduction margins (Dawson and Stewart, 2007;Peters et al, 2007). Additionally, we observed increased frequency of boulders in the intertidal and supralittoral zones at the western coast of the littoral bar at Puerto Saavedra, with respect to the situation before the tsunami, according to witnesses reports (Fig.…”
Section: Tsunami Heights and Coastal Impactsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12b, c), in some cases several hundred of meters inland, overlying organic fine deposits in lagoons and estuaries. The 2010 deposits are similar to tsunami deposits as sand layers within peat and mud sediments in coastal environments as tidal marshes, back-barrier marshes and lagoons reported in other subduction margins (Dawson and Stewart, 2007;Peters et al, 2007). Additionally, we observed increased frequency of boulders in the intertidal and supralittoral zones at the western coast of the littoral bar at Puerto Saavedra, with respect to the situation before the tsunami, according to witnesses reports (Fig.…”
Section: Tsunami Heights and Coastal Impactsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…11c). The latter is comparable to the presence of large boulders left in intertidal and suppralittoral zones by historic tsunamis in other coastal areas as summarized by Dawson and Stewart (2007). These deposits resulted from onshore transport of material during run-up, analogue to present and past examples (Dawson and Stewart, 2007).…”
Section: Tsunami Heights and Coastal Impactsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast, mud and sand clasts (facies B) were previously used to discriminate storm and tsunami deposits (e.g., Morton et al, 2007;Phantuwongraj and Choowong, 2012), as were terrestrial components and anthropogenic artifacts. The backwash transports a variety of material from the hinterland towards offshore, and the high-density backwash flows support the formation of clasts (Dawson and Stewart, 2007;Morton et al, 2007;Shanmugam, 2011;Ramírez-Herrera et al, 2012). In contrast, erosion during storms is focused on the shoreface and the beach (Snedden et al, 1988;Allison et al, 2005); thus, clasts and terrestrial material are expected to appear less frequently within storm deposits.…”
Section: Comparison Of Tsunami Storm and Flash-flood Faciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly caused by their vulnerability to erosion (particularly those deposited onshore; e.g. Dawson and Stewart 2007), and by their susceptibility to early diagenetic changes that overprinted the original sedimentary features (Szczuciński et al 2006. Lists of sedimentary features characteristic of palaeotsunami deposits have been presented by some authors (e.g.…”
Section: Tsunami Interpretation Of Stromato-poroid Beds and Flat-pebbmentioning
confidence: 99%