1998
DOI: 10.1177/1525822x980100020301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
987
0
17

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,206 publications
(1,005 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
987
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Four members of the research team independently reviewed the data to identify themes and develop a codebook. 21 Codes, subcodes, and definitions, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, were reviewed and revised by the research team to identify overlapping or missing codes. Quotations that illustrated the main themes were identified during the coding process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four members of the research team independently reviewed the data to identify themes and develop a codebook. 21 Codes, subcodes, and definitions, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, were reviewed and revised by the research team to identify overlapping or missing codes. Quotations that illustrated the main themes were identified during the coding process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed the qualitative data analysis method endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to code the responses [15]. We identified categories a priori from studies describing subjective explanations for obesity [7,[10][11][12][13][14], as well as from our clinical experience.…”
Section: Research Methods and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the codebook was guided by recommendations from MacQueen, McLellan, Kay, and Milstein (1998), in which codes were operationalized through coding definitions and coding decision rules in an iterative process involving multiple coding manual revisions. This process involved the systematic review of codes by two independent coders to determine the utility of the codes and consistency in their application.…”
Section: Analytic Procedures Qualitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis in which themes were uncovered through reading all transcripts, making notes on initial impressions, and letting the codes emerge directly from the text (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005;Ryan & Bernard, 2000). Recurring team meetings were held for in-depth discussion of the various topics that emerged and the negotiation of how to best translate these topics into definable and measurable themes, or codes, as well as the coding structure as it evolved throughout the analysis of transcripts.The development of the codebook was guided by recommendations from MacQueen, McLellan, Kay, and Milstein (1998), in which codes were operationalized through coding definitions and coding decision rules in an iterative process involving multiple coding manual revisions. This process involved the systematic review of codes by two independent coders to determine the utility of the codes and consistency in their application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%