1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(94)90292-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coded aperture imaging using imperfect detector systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) for each plane and finally we add the data from the matrix T to the corresponding voxels from the planes of I z to produce the final decoded images. Note that this is similar to the technique used to remove artifacts from coded aperture systems having imperfect detectors in [18] and is similar to the CLEAN algorithm used in radio astronomy [14] but we here operate in the detector shadowgram domain rather than the final reconstructed image domain. For ease of discussion we hereafter refer to the whole image processing technique as z-Clean, with processed images being referred to as having been z-Cleaned.…”
Section: Image Processing Technique: Z-cleanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) for each plane and finally we add the data from the matrix T to the corresponding voxels from the planes of I z to produce the final decoded images. Note that this is similar to the technique used to remove artifacts from coded aperture systems having imperfect detectors in [18] and is similar to the CLEAN algorithm used in radio astronomy [14] but we here operate in the detector shadowgram domain rather than the final reconstructed image domain. For ease of discussion we hereafter refer to the whole image processing technique as z-Clean, with processed images being referred to as having been z-Cleaned.…”
Section: Image Processing Technique: Z-cleanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This arrangement has the desirable property that artifactfree images can be reconstructed by simple correlation techniques (Gunson & Polychronopulos 1976;Fenimore & Cannon 1978). If the detector plane is not completely filled, many of the advantages of a URA mask disappear, and correlation techniques produce images with significant artifacts (Byard & Ramsden 1994). For the proposed spherical geometry with a significantly incomplete detection "plane", it is not immediately apparent whether analogues of the URA can be constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%