2022
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2022.3181411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coded Caching With Full Heterogeneity: Exact Capacity of the Two-User/Two-File Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average rate of a system with heterogeneous users was addressed in [6], [11], [12], but just for the case of two users. This paper considers a system with a single server connected to K end users through an error-free broadcast link.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average rate of a system with heterogeneous users was addressed in [6], [11], [12], but just for the case of two users. This paper considers a system with a single server connected to K end users through an error-free broadcast link.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true in heterogeneous scenarios like the one we consider here, where one expects to find larger caches that serve the many users of large office buildings coexisting with smaller caches that serve smaller pockets of population. It is worth remarking that deriving fundamental limits for asymmetric settings is a challenging topic, as it has been shown in the recent work [51], where the authors fully characterized the exact capacity of the 2-file/2-user setting simultaneously allowing for heterogeneous files sizes, heterogeneous cache sizes, and user-dependent file popularities.…”
Section: B Memory Allocation In Cache-aided Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since under the regular assumption of Definition 1 it holds that t is integer (i.e., t ∈ [Λ] 0 ), we first note that t = t. Furthermore, this assumption implies that āt = 1 and āj = 0 for any j ∈ {[Λ] 0 \t}. We can lower bound (51) by fixing p to p = t, which reduces (51) to…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%