2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0221-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coefficient of restitution and kinetic energy loss of rockfall impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e kinetic energy loss is small when the junction of slope and the accumulation area is a curved slope break; when the junction has sharp edges, the kinetic energy loss is larger [13,22]. Under the experimental conditions, in which slope height H and volume are constant, as the slope angle increases, energy loss also increases due to the collision of the flowslide and the horizontal plate at the slope break [43,44], which results in shorter distance of movement of the sliding body. e slope angle in the chalk flow area is too large, and the energy loss is excessive though the sliding path is lubricated by water beneath the accumulation area 1-2 m. e flowslides in Wenchuan affected by lubrication due to water are few.…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…e kinetic energy loss is small when the junction of slope and the accumulation area is a curved slope break; when the junction has sharp edges, the kinetic energy loss is larger [13,22]. Under the experimental conditions, in which slope height H and volume are constant, as the slope angle increases, energy loss also increases due to the collision of the flowslide and the horizontal plate at the slope break [43,44], which results in shorter distance of movement of the sliding body. e slope angle in the chalk flow area is too large, and the energy loss is excessive though the sliding path is lubricated by water beneath the accumulation area 1-2 m. e flowslides in Wenchuan affected by lubrication due to water are few.…”
Section: Advances In Civil Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(2) e objective function y � f x (z, m v ) in (11)fd11 is an uncertainty function, which was represented using the neural network model described in Section 2.3.1. (3) Using the historical rockfall data, the normal and tangential coefficients of restitution [33][34][35] and the friction angle of the Guanyindong Slope were determined using the theory of displacement back analysis (Figure 8) [32]. Based on the parameters, RocFall 2D software was used to simulate possible rockfall events for each cross profile and to obtain sample data for these rockfall events.…”
Section: Field Investigation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, the motion trajectories of the blocks are the external manifestation of their total kinetic energies. The total kinetic energy (including translational and rotational) can be increased owing to the transformation of gravitational potential energy during the downward movement of the block, or can be dissipated through collisions between the block and the slope, and among blocks (Li et al 2016;Zhu et al 2019). It can be said that the kinetic energy and motion trajectory are the main basis for determining the strength as well as the location and scale of rockfall protection structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%