Coevolution of institutions and residents toward sustainable glocal development: a case study on the Kuni Umi solar power project on Awaji Island

Tokumaru, Natsuka

doi:10.1007/s40844-019-00153-1

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The lives of project-affected people are influenced by massive deficiencies in service delivery, which condition the everyday lives of residents [86]. The lives of affected communities are also marked by massive deficiencies in quality of life [65]. Other scholars have addressed the fact that affected residents are invariably either displaced, are unable to financially transition, or are exposed to environmental hazards [87,88].…”

Section: Impacts Of Megaprojectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Affected Local Community Participation Research in Megaproject-Induced Displacement

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Megaproject-induced displacement of populations will now occur more frequently due to massive infrastructure investment in the post-COVID-19 era. The participatory process for megaprojects starts with those in the vicinity; local communities who are directly involved. However, few studies have attempted to map the global knowledge of local community participation in the planning stage of megaprojects. A systematic literature review of public participation in the context of megaproject-induced displacement was conducted to determine these features, and to provide local community insights which are useful for managing social issues around megaprojects and the effects of participation. A total of 32 journal publications were analyzed from the Web of Science (WoS) database, drawing from an initial group of 456 based on citations from 2012 to 2022 to identify the evolution of knowledge trends. It was found that the nonfulfillment participatory process always fails to recognize groups of residents and assess the impacts of megaproject-induced displacement caused to local communities. This lack of recognition at the governmental level contributes to conflict; placing the local community at risk of uncertain megaproject environments. Broader public participation involves local communities, who be harmed by the development strategies of megaprojects, catalyzing their willingness to participate and encourage greater inclusiveness in their interactions, as well as balancing the megaproject’s economic, ecologic, and social interests. The study results demonstrate a consensus was reached, and the effects of megaproject-induced displacement can be mediated.

show abstract

Section: Impacts Of Megaprojectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Affected Local Community Participation Research in Megaproject-Induced Displacement

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Institution building initiatives and processes have been implemented in different contexts and sectors (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). For the specific case of the public health sector, National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) are established to provide "science-based leadership, expertise, and coordination of a country's public health activities, " among other core functions (17).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strengthening national public health institutes: a systematic review on institution building in the public sector

Brugnara,

Jaramillo,

Olarte-Peña

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionStrong and efficient institutions are vital to the development of well-functioning governments and strong societies. The term “institution building” encompasses the creation, support, development, and strengthening of organizations and institutions. Still, there is little aggregated evidence on “institution building” considering a wider system-thinking approach, best practices, or development cooperation specifically in the field of public health. In 2007, the International Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI) created a guiding Framework that countries may use for developing National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs). This Framework is currently being revised.MethodsIn this context, we conducted a systematic review to facilitate this revision with recent evidence on institution building and its potential contribution to NPHI. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, searching for relevant publications in seven scientific databases (Pubmed, VHL/LILACS, EconLit, Google Scholar, Web of Science, World Affairs Online, ECONBIZ) and four libraries (World Bank; European Health for All database of the World Health Organization European Region, WHO; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD; and the African Union Common Repository). The search was carried out in October 2021. We used the “framework analysis” tool for systematically processing documents according to key themes.ResultsAs a result, we identified 3,015 records, of which we included 62 documents in the final review. This systematic review fills a major gap of aggregated information on institution building in the field of public health and National Public Health Institutes. It is to our knowledge the first systematic review of this kind. The overriding result is the identification and definition of six domains of institution building in the health sector: “governance,” “knowledge and innovation,” “inter-institutional cooperation,” “monitoring and control,” “participation,” and “sustainability and context-specific adaptability.”DiscussionOur results show that the described domains are highly relevant to the public health sector, and that managers and the scientific community recognize their importance. Still, they are often not applied consistently when creating or developing NPHIs. We conclude that organizations engaged in institution building of NPHIs, including IANPHI, may greatly benefit from state-of-the-art research on institution building as presented in this study.

show abstract

“…The symposium aimed to bring together students and researchers with their latest academic research to facilitate a wider public discussion (Ikeda 2020a). Seven papers (Chabay 2020); (Shinwell 2020); (Ikeda 2020b); (Tokumaru 2020); (Nakamoto et al 2020); (Nomura 2020); (Yoshikawa et al 2020) have been published in the special issue: The 7th International Symposium on Human Survivability "Let's Work Together Toward Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals"-Part I, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2020. The following are brief summaries of the other four papers that were major outcomes of the symposium.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Special issue: the 7th international symposium on human survivability “let’s work together toward achieving the sustainable development goals”—part II

Ikeda

2020

Evolut Inst Econ Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coevolution of institutions and residents toward sustainable glocal development: a case study on the Kuni Umi solar power project on Awaji Island

Cited by 6 publications

References 28 publications

Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Affected Local Community Participation Research in Megaproject-Induced Displacement

Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Affected Local Community Participation Research in Megaproject-Induced Displacement

Strengthening national public health institutes: a systematic review on institution building in the public sector

Special issue: the 7th international symposium on human survivability “let’s work together toward achieving the sustainable development goals”—part II

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About