2002
DOI: 10.1142/s0129183102003942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexistence of Opposite Global Social Feelings: The Case of Percolation Driven Insecurity

Abstract: A model of the dynamics of appearance of a new collective feeling, in addition and opposite to an existing one, is presented. Using percolation theory, the collective feeling of insecurity is shown to be able to coexist with the opposite collective feeling of safety. Indeed this coexistence of contradictory social feelings result from the simultaneous percolation of two infinite clusters of people who are respectively experiencing a safe and unsafe local environment. Therefore opposing claims on national debat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to above heterogeneity we applied with Pajot, percolation theory to address the problem of coexistence of opposite collective opinions, like for instance with the feeling of safeness, within the same social frame. The possibility of superposition of simultaneous percolation from two different species was analyzed and shown to provide an explanation to such a paradoxical social phenomenon [59].…”
Section: Heterogeneous Beliefs Contrarian and Inflexible Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to above heterogeneity we applied with Pajot, percolation theory to address the problem of coexistence of opposite collective opinions, like for instance with the feeling of safeness, within the same social frame. The possibility of superposition of simultaneous percolation from two different species was analyzed and shown to provide an explanation to such a paradoxical social phenomenon [59].…”
Section: Heterogeneous Beliefs Contrarian and Inflexible Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is considerable current interest in opinion models [16], among which we cite the the Sznajd model [17], the voter model [18], the naming game [19,20] and Galam models [21,22]. But the influence of more than one network has gathered less attention [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galam 19,20 and Pajot and Galam 21 focused on the problem of minority opinion under a physical principle called the ''inertia principle''. The inertia effect means that in an update with equal-sized groups, the opinion that preserves the status quo is selected locally by all the group members.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minority issue that the initial minority may win the competition spreading over the entire population has gained much attention in the past. Galam 19,20 and Pajot and Galam 21 focused on the problem of minority opinion under a physical principle called the “inertia principle”. The inertia effect means that in an update with equal-sized groups, the opinion that preserves the status quo is selected locally by all the group members.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%