2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CoFiGAN: Collaborative filtering by generative and discriminative training for one-class recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, implicit useritem interactions, formally defined as a binary state using 1 to indicate the existence of the interaction (such as click, browse, or watch) between a user and an item, and 0 otherwise, occur more frequently and are easier to be accessed than explicit interactions due to the no requirement for user's additional operations like giving ratings for implicit ones. However, implicit user-item interactions can't directly carry user's preferences for items; thus brings the so-called one-class problem [85], which has been tried to surmount by such as converting implicit user-item interactions to explicit ones [86,87].…”
Section: Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, implicit useritem interactions, formally defined as a binary state using 1 to indicate the existence of the interaction (such as click, browse, or watch) between a user and an item, and 0 otherwise, occur more frequently and are easier to be accessed than explicit interactions due to the no requirement for user's additional operations like giving ratings for implicit ones. However, implicit user-item interactions can't directly carry user's preferences for items; thus brings the so-called one-class problem [85], which has been tried to surmount by such as converting implicit user-item interactions to explicit ones [86,87].…”
Section: Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For personalised recommendation tasks, the generator model is mainly regarded as the negative sampler for the ranker. Hence, GAN-based methods have often been explored in the context of the negative sampling strategies [23,26,40,60,62,70]. On the other hand, since GANs originally aim to estimate the generative distribution of observed data, when using the generator as the ranker model, GANbased methods are more like the DE approach; the softmax model is widely adopted for the generator.…”
Section: Negative Sampling and Generative Adversarial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative Rec. IRGAN [125] 2017 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ CFGAN [18] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ Chae et al [19] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ AVAE [143] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ CAAE [20] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ CGAN [113] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ CALF [30] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ PD-GAN [132] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ LambdaGAN [128] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ VAEGAN [139] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ APL [108] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ RsyGAN [137] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ GAN-PW/LSTM [24] 2019 ✓ ✓ ✓ CoFiGAN [73] 2020 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Graph-based Collaborative Rec. GraphGAN [122] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ GAN-HBNR [11] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ VCGAN [145] 2018 ✓ ✓ ✓ UPGAN [48] 2020 ✓ ✓ ✓ Hybrid Collaborative Rec.…”
Section: Model Namementioning
confidence: 99%