Eating and Its Disorders 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118328910.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Behavioural Models in Eating Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study supported Hypothesis 1, because the AN group demonstrated significantly higher levels of internal‐dysfunctional emotional regulation style and significantly lower levels of internal‐functional emotional regulation strategies. This finding is very much in keeping with the previous literature that has shown that AN clients are more likely to ruminate and punish themselves for experiencing an emotion (e.g., Fox, ; Cooper, ). Although some of the findings only suggested trends, it was interesting that the AN group reported less external‐functional strategies in managing emotions, and this would fit with the clinical observation that people with AN do not share or work through their emotions with others but would keep them to themselves, albeit in a dysfunctional way (see Pemberton & Fox, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of this study supported Hypothesis 1, because the AN group demonstrated significantly higher levels of internal‐dysfunctional emotional regulation style and significantly lower levels of internal‐functional emotional regulation strategies. This finding is very much in keeping with the previous literature that has shown that AN clients are more likely to ruminate and punish themselves for experiencing an emotion (e.g., Fox, ; Cooper, ). Although some of the findings only suggested trends, it was interesting that the AN group reported less external‐functional strategies in managing emotions, and this would fit with the clinical observation that people with AN do not share or work through their emotions with others but would keep them to themselves, albeit in a dysfunctional way (see Pemberton & Fox, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another argument for investigating shame is the growing body of evidence which indicates that negative affect and emotion dysregulation might play a key role in the development and maintenance of ED (e.g., Bydlowski et al, 2005;Hilbert & Tuschen-Caffier, 2007). While well-established cognitive-behavioral models of ED (e.g., Fairburn, Shafran, & Cooper, 1999) highlight cognitive distortions as the main mechanisms behind this symptomatology, updated cognitive approaches of ED (e.g., Cooper, 2012) assert emotional factors as having an important role in explaining disordered eating episodes. When referring to the causes of ED, there are authors who suggest that negative affect and negative feelings about the self might result in dieting (Polivy & Herman, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relapse rates for both AN and BN are reportedly high (Carter, Blackmore, Sutandar‐Pinnock, & Woodside, ; Grilo et al ., ). A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying and maintaining these presentations is essential to best support and intervene with AN and BN (Cooper, ). Cognitive models have dominated contemporary psychological explanations of AN and BN (Waller & Kennerley, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recognition of the role of emotion in AN and BN is now evident in cognitive approaches (e.g., Cooper, ; Cooper, Wells, & Todd, ). If shame or guilt play a substantive role in the development and maintenance of AN and BN, then there may be a value to adapting existing interventions such as CBT to better account for the presence of shame or guilt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%