Cognitive Determinants of Dysarthria in Parkinson's Disease: An Automated Machine Learning Approach

Abstract

Background Dysarthric symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) vary greatly across cohorts. Abundant research suggests that such heterogeneity could reflect subject‐level and task‐related cognitive factors. However, the interplay of these variables during motor speech remains underexplored, let alone by administering validated materials to carefully matched samples with varying cognitive profiles and combining automated tools with machine learning methods. Objective We aimed to identify which speech dimensions best identify patients with PD in cognitively heterogeneous, cognitively preserved, and cognitively impaired groups through tasks with low (reading) and high (retelling) processing demands. Methods We used support vector machines to analyze prosodic, articulatory, and phonemic identifiability features. Patient groups were compared with healthy control subjects and against each other in both tasks, using each measure separately and in combination. Results Relative to control subjects, patients in cognitively heterogeneous and cognitively preserved groups were best discriminated by combined dysarthric signs during reading (accuracy = 84% and 80.2%). Conversely, patients with cognitive impairment were maximally discriminated from control subjects when considering phonemic identifiability during retelling (accuracy = 86.9%). This same pattern maximally distinguished between cognitively spared and impaired patients (accuracy = 72.1%). Also, cognitive (executive) symptom severity was predicted by prosody in cognitively preserved patients and by phonemic identifiability in cognitively heterogeneous and impaired groups. No measure predicted overall motor dysfunction in any group. Conclusions Predominant dysarthric symptoms appear to be best captured through undemanding tasks in cognitively heterogeneous and preserved cohorts and through cognitively loaded tasks in patients with cognitive impairment. Further applications of this framework could enhance dysarthria assessments in PD. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Voice characteristics from isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder to early Parkinson's disease

“…syntax for reading and, in addition, speech content planification, word choice, and memory for the free speech task) in addition to the motor component of the disorder. The discriminant power of median pause duration was more pronounced during free speech, possibly due to a stronger cognitive component in this task, which in accordance with a recent study on Spanish speakers [23].…”

Automated text‐level semantic markers of Alzheimer's disease

“… 22 Conversely, ASA entails minimal costs, generating objective naturalistic data. 5 , 49 Furthermore, speech tasks can be administered remotely, maximizing accessibility and equity for persons with reduced mobility or capacity to afford transportation costs. These possibilities open exciting avenues to further test our measures.…”

Automated detection of speech timing alterations in autopsy-confirmed non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia

“…12 Notably, these distinctions proved significant upon controlling for dementia severity, which is notable given that cognitive impairment can influence motor speech deficits. 29…”

“…These tasks’ discrepant demands elicit distinct predominant motor speech disruptions, with prosodic alterations proving more salient during reading. 29 Also, no specific assessment of speech timing was conducted therein. Furthermore, dysprosodic signs have been highlighted in CBD, 2, 10 and slow syllabically segmented prosody is a diagnostic criterion 46 for a speech-predominant disorder more likely caused by CBD than PSP.…”

“…Moreover, they prove sensitive to speech timing alterations in nfvPPA and other neurodegenerative conditions. 15, 29 Participants were asked to read at their own pace, with normal volume and cadence. Their speech was recorded, saved as .wav files (44.1 KHz, 16 bits), and analyzed to capture five timing measures: articulation rate (syllables per second of phonated time, upon pause removal), syllable duration (mean across all syllables), pause duration (mean across all pauses, defined as silent intervals between speech sound offset and onset), syllable duration variability (standard deviations of syllabic durations), and pause duration variability (standard deviation of pause durations).…”