2020
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2020.1804824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive discourse functions in CLIL classrooms: eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorizations in science and history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a quantitative study, Evnitskaya & Dalton-Puffer (2020) found that pupils were able to generate comparisons of both similarity and difference in Spanish (first language) and English (second language) while discussing zoology and botany. Although they used a considerably wider range of lexical resources in Spanish, particularly to express differences, the researchers found no statistical differences between Spanish and English in the conceptual complexity of the facts and ideas that pupils verbalized, despite their differing degrees of lexical richness.…”
Section: The Use Of First and Second Languages In Science Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a quantitative study, Evnitskaya & Dalton-Puffer (2020) found that pupils were able to generate comparisons of both similarity and difference in Spanish (first language) and English (second language) while discussing zoology and botany. Although they used a considerably wider range of lexical resources in Spanish, particularly to express differences, the researchers found no statistical differences between Spanish and English in the conceptual complexity of the facts and ideas that pupils verbalized, despite their differing degrees of lexical richness.…”
Section: The Use Of First and Second Languages In Science Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whittaker et al (2011) reported on the slow emergence of textual coherence and nominal group structures in learners' history essays over a four-year period, and their lack of control in using evaluative language in a range of school subjects (Whittaker & McCabe, 2020). More recently, Evnitskaya and Dalton-Puffer (2023) and Nashaat Sobhy and Llinares (2023) have described the production in Spanish (L1) and English (L2) of the classification and comparison functions of CLIL learners in grades 6 and 8 in science and history. Although valuable in elucidating CLIL learners' academic language competence in different disciplines, these findings have emerged from the examination of learner corpora rather than from classroom interventions.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Systemic Functional Linguistics and Ge...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined in this way, reports may be thought of as having classifying and defining as their main CDFs (Dalton-Puffer, 2013). According to Evnitskaya and Dalton-Puffer (2020), classifications may vary around three basic parameters which include direction (whether the member to be classified is introduced before the class it belongs to or vice versa), basis (the criteria on which the similarities and differences between members constituting the classification are established), and completeness (whether all three previous elements, that is, member, class and basis of classification, are present or one of them is absent). Definitions, in turn, are usually realized by including class membership and specifying those features (qualities, circumstances, etc.)…”
Section: The Report Genrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, the impact of CLIL on learners' production of cognitive discourse functions has hardly been analyzed, as CLIL research has largely been limited to contrastive studies with non-CLIL programs on the quality of texts produced by students (e.g., Artieda et al, 2017;Lahuerta, 2020). Two recent studies, however, have attempted to shed light on the academic language competence of grade 6 primary and grade 8 secondary school learners by analyzing their oral production of classification and comparison functions in L2 English and L1 Spanish in science and history (Evnitskaya & Dalton-Puffer, 2020) and their written definitions in history (Nashaat-Soby & Llinares, 2020). Both studies, informed by an SFL theory of learning, further our understanding of how CLIL learners express subject knowledge through their lexico-grammatical choices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%