2010
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression Emotion Regulation Strategies in Cigarette Smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(52 reference statements)
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings confirmed by earlier experimental and correlation study findings that cognitive reappraisal mitigates the development of maladaptive behavioural responses such as alcohol use when one is confronted by emotionally arousing situations (Stappenbeck & Fromme, 2014). Further, compared to nonsmokers, smokers scored low on the reappraisal scale, and smoked with expectations that it would help them manage negative feelings (Fucito, Juliano, & Toll, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These findings confirmed by earlier experimental and correlation study findings that cognitive reappraisal mitigates the development of maladaptive behavioural responses such as alcohol use when one is confronted by emotionally arousing situations (Stappenbeck & Fromme, 2014). Further, compared to nonsmokers, smokers scored low on the reappraisal scale, and smoked with expectations that it would help them manage negative feelings (Fucito, Juliano, & Toll, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Studies show that such visual cues can trigger urges to smoke 14. Additionally, smokers who are trying to quit smoking and suppressing their cravings end up thinking about smoking cigarettes more, pay more attention to smoking cues in their environment,16 and may even smoke more 17. These prior studies focused on cigarette smoking cues, but we believe they may also be relevant to ENDS because they are designed to look and function like cigarettes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes in evaluation are evident even when assessed with implicit attitude measures-assessments that do not require conscious deliberation by participants (Fujita & Han, 2009). This latter finding indicates that these changes in evaluation are not likely due to some effortful or deliberative corrective mechanism, but rather to a change in the subjective interpretation or construal of the temptation (for similar distinctions between construal and inhibition, see e.g., Fucito, Juliano, & Toll, 2010;Goldin, McRae, Ramel, & Gross, 2008). High-level relative to low-level construal promotes representations that direct people's attention to the negative goal-relevant features of temptations, which in turn impacts behavioral decisions (Fujita & Han, 2009).…”
Section: Structured Versus Unstructured Regulation: the Role Of Constmentioning
confidence: 93%