1980
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.45.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent-State Representation of Many-Fermion Quantum Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L E C Rosales-Zárate and P D Drummond normalization by the determinant given in equation (28). Hence the integral over the variables λ is ∞ −∞ dλ 2 (λ 2 )P (1)…”
Section: Evaluation Of Integralsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…L E C Rosales-Zárate and P D Drummond normalization by the determinant given in equation (28). Hence the integral over the variables λ is ∞ −∞ dλ 2 (λ 2 )P (1)…”
Section: Evaluation Of Integralsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These are obtained as the action of a representation of a Lie group on an extremal state. This definition is related to the dynamical structure of the corresponding creation and annihilation operators, using U (N) Lie group methods [7][8][9]18,[26][27][28][29][30] . In this approach, an integral over the coherent state projectors appears, but it does not generate an identity operator for all fermion states, due to number conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the useful property of being the set of all independent-particle states. The classical Hamiltonian on this manifold is then defined by the expectation values of the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian in its coherent states and the classical Hamiltonian equations of motion, defined by time-dependent HF theory, are identical to the corresponding equations of motion of constrained quantum mechanics as shown in references [44][45][46] and reviewed in chapter 6 of [47]. Thus, a classical equilibrium state on this manifold is a state for which the expectation value of the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian is a (local) minimum.…”
Section: A Classical Mean-field Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is convenient to introduce fermionic creation and annihilation operatorsf † i , f j , (1 ≤ i, j ≤ N ), which obey standard anticommutation rules {f † i , f j } = δ ij . It is well known that the family of Slater determinants provides an over-complete basis in F(M, N ), which behaves in many ways as the family of coherent states for a bosonic system 2,[11][12][13][14] . The Slater determinants for M fermions are defined, up to a global phase, by the M -dimensional subspace in C N spanned by the occupied single particle states.…”
Section: B Gr(m N) Coherent Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%