1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02837250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomology of the moduli of parabolic vector bundles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More important for us is the generalization of the above result to allow parabolic structure [77]. We will state this theorem for any number of ramification points with arbitrary choices of parabolic subgroups.…”
Section: Scaling Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…More important for us is the generalization of the above result to allow parabolic structure [77]. We will state this theorem for any number of ramification points with arbitrary choices of parabolic subgroups.…”
Section: Scaling Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In case (a) the corresponding critical subvariety can obviously be identified with the moduli space of ordinary parabolic bundles. Its Betti numbers can be computed from a formula given by Nitsure [34] and Holla [25]. In Section 10 below we work out explicitly what their formula gives for the Poincaré polynomial in our situation of rank three parabolic bundles.…”
Section: Morse Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Betti numbers of the moduli space of parabolic vector bundles were computed by Nitsure [34] and Holla [25]. Here we work out Holla's formula for the special case when the rank is 3 and all flags at the parabolic points are full.…”
Section: Betti Numbers Of the Moduli Space Of Rank Three Parabolic Bumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reproved by Atiyah and Bott [1] using gauge theory. The methods of Nitsure [9] generalize the approach of Atiyah and Bott [1] to parabolic bundles.) Now, if i : SU X (n, L, ∆)−→SU X (n, L, ∆) × J X denotes the map E → (E, O X ), and if j : SU X (n, L, ∆)→U X (n, d, ∆) denotes the inclusion, then j = π • i.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 98%