2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2013.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coinductive Predicates and Final Sequences in a Fibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of the second part of Lemma 10.6, the lax Pre-liftings of the functors F × Id, S(F × Id) and F T with respect to the orders in (22) are respectively given by…”
Section: Monotone Gsosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence of the second part of Lemma 10.6, the lax Pre-liftings of the functors F × Id, S(F × Id) and F T with respect to the orders in (22) are respectively given by…”
Section: Monotone Gsosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibrations Rel(Nom) → Nom and Sub(Nom) → Nom are well-founded in the sense of [22]. To prove this we can apply [22,Lemma 3.4], which gives as a sufficient condition for well-foundedness: that the fibre above each finitely presentable object be finite.…”
Section: Soundness Of Bisimulation Up To Congruencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations