2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cold temperature preference in bacterially infected Drosophila melanogaster improves survival but is remarkably suboptimal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, lytic activity has previously been shown to vary less than PO activity, with the relative constancy having been primarily attributed to limited phenotypic plasticity in this trait (Triggs and Knell, 2012;McNamara et al, 2013a). Consistent with our observations on PP (but not the other two species), host plant has been shown to affect antimicrobial activity in a moth (Lobesia botrana; Vogelweith et al, 2013b) and lytic activity has been found to increase with temperature in Drosophila (Lazzaro et al, 2008;Fedorka et al, 2016). We are unaware of any studies showing among-population variation in lytic activity in insects, although a lack of variation has been reported for a crustacean (Daphnia magna; Mucklow et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, lytic activity has previously been shown to vary less than PO activity, with the relative constancy having been primarily attributed to limited phenotypic plasticity in this trait (Triggs and Knell, 2012;McNamara et al, 2013a). Consistent with our observations on PP (but not the other two species), host plant has been shown to affect antimicrobial activity in a moth (Lobesia botrana; Vogelweith et al, 2013b) and lytic activity has been found to increase with temperature in Drosophila (Lazzaro et al, 2008;Fedorka et al, 2016). We are unaware of any studies showing among-population variation in lytic activity in insects, although a lack of variation has been reported for a crustacean (Daphnia magna; Mucklow et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, but less dramatically w MelCS, the progenitor of w MelPop, is also costly by reducing host lifespan due to high symbiont densities at 25°C (Chrostek et al ., ). We, therefore, speculate that the adjustment of lower temperature preference in D. melanogaster as a response to the w MelCS and w MelPop infections represents a physiological self‐medicating behaviour or behavioural chill (Fedorka et al ., ) to attenuate the fitness costs associated with deleterious effects of Wolbachia over‐proliferation and high cell densities (Chrostek et al ., ; Strunov et al ., , b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Host-symbiont conflicts may arise from disparities between physiological requirements of Wolbachia and those of their hosts. For example, some insects induce behavioural fever (Louis et al, 1986) or behavioural chill (Fedorka et al, 2016) as an immune strategy to fight bacterial pathogen infections. Conversely, some bacterial symbionts are known to alter their host's thermal tolerance range in an adaptive manner (Russell and Moran, 2006;Dunbar et al, 2007; reviewed by Wernegreen, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid fluctuations that shift hosts away from temperatures to which they have been acclimated have been identified as a potential driver of changes in host susceptibility (Fedorka et al 2016;Cohen et al 2017). When temperature changes occur for both hosts and parasites, differences in their abilities to acclimate or adapt will be important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%