3 1 exposure to hypoxia, (iii) this response enables us to keep the wide scope for aerobic 3 2 performance, and (iv) it prevents the decrease in fitness. We conducted our tests on three clones 3 3 of the rotifer Lecane inermis with different thermal preferences. These clones were exposed to 3 4 three experimental regimes: mild hypoxia, severe hypoxia driven by a too high temperature, and 3 5 severe hypoxia driven by an inadequate oxygen concentration. The results showed that our 3 6 causative reasoning was generally correct, but only under mildly hypoxic conditions. In more 3 7 stressful environments, rotifers had clone-and condition-specific responses, which in fact were 3 8 equally successful in terms of the levels of fitness. Our results join for the first time all factors 3 9 connecting the cause and effect in the temperature-size rule. They indicate the importance of the 4 0conditions under which it should be tested. The most important messages from this study was that 4 1 (i) a decrease in the body size was one of but not the only option for preventing fitness reduction 4 2 under hypoxia, and (ii) such a response to higher temperature fuelled the aerobic scope in clone-4 3 specific, thermally optimal conditions. 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 7 1 2018; Verberk and Atkinson, 2013) and directly (Czarnoleski et al., 2015; Frazier et al., 2001; 7 2 Hoefnagel and Verberk, 2015). However, results relating this pattern directly to organismal 7 3 fitness are scarce (Prokosch et al., 2019; Walczyńska et al., 2015a), while such a reference is the 7 4only way that enables reliable conclusions on the evolutionary meaning of TSR. 7 5In this study, we linked the hypothesized proximate and ultimate mechanisms behind the 7 6 phenotypically driven size decrease with increasing temperature for the case of the rotifer Lecane 7 7inermis. We aimed to thoroughly test the logic of the reasoning behind hypoxia driving body size 7 8shrinkage to prevent the reduction in fitness. Because the TSR has been empirically confirmed to 7 9 be condition-sensitive and to be performed only in an optimal thermal range (Walczyńska et al., 8 0 4 2016), we conducted our tests under optimal and suboptimal conditions; the latter was further 8 1 diversified between hypoxia driven by stress-inducing high temperatures or by the stress-8 2 inducing low oxygen levels. This distinction enabled inference on the possible border conditions 8 3 for TSR performance, linking the hypothesized proximate and ultimate factors with fitness. 8 4We examined the aerobic scope, our hypothesized ultimate mechanism, by estimating the specific 8 5 dynamic action (SDA). This measure refers to the increasing metabolic expenditures in animals 8 6 and is associated with ingestion, digestion, assimilation and absorption of food (McCue, 2006; 8 7 Secor, 2009), when the increasing oxygen consumption was mostly associated with the 8 8 biochemical transformation of food and the synthesis of the new proteins (Jordan and Steffensen, 8 92007). In practice, it was estimated as a difference in...