2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12525-021-00486-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative consumption continuance: a mixed-methods analysis of the service quality-loyalty relationship in ride-sharing services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the paper provides a non‐service perspective on ridesharing, and thus, advances the work of the like of Lim et al. (2021) and Mitropoulos et al. (2021) to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this regard, the paper provides a non‐service perspective on ridesharing, and thus, advances the work of the like of Lim et al. (2021) and Mitropoulos et al. (2021) to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Despite making good and sensible progress in advocating for a balance approach to sustainability where all aspects of sustainability are treated equally in terms of its importance and evaluation (Lim, 2016) along with the emergence of contemporary ideal practices such as co-creation (Apostolidis et al, 2021), collaborative consumption (Lim, Gupta, et al, 2021), ESG (environmental, social, and governance) reporting (Paolone et al, 2021), and the sharing economy (Lim, 2020), the truth of the matter is that all indicators and impacts of unsustainable consumption, and thus production, continue to persist, if not, worsen (Lim, 2022; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2021; United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2020; Zhou & Moinuddin, 2021).…”
Section: (Re)thinking Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would contribute to the sustainability agenda by increasing the lifetime of the products, making it easier to bind customers to their firms in the long run, and thus, offer a source of steady service income for firms. Firms can also choose not to sell physical goods as a whole but only their use, such as leasing, renting, and pooling, as seen in technology-mediated collaborative consumption (Lim, Gupta, et al, 2021) and the sharing economy (Lim, 2020). With these sharing opportunities, consumers will be able to access and utilize goods without having to pay higher prices for the ownership of those goods.…”
Section: Implications For Practice (Firms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the plethora of definitions available, Acquier et al [1] concludes that there are both narrow and broad views of the sharing economy due to the everchanging nature of the market, which suggests that it is difficult to accurately define the sharing economy because its practice is never constant. Moreover, the concept of the sharing economy has also been subjected to interchangeable usage with collaborative consumption (e.g., Lim et al [36]). Nevertheless, Belk [8] offers a distinction, stating that collaborative consumption is mainly motivated by making profit, whereas sharing involves more aspects of community and reciprocity from the parties involved.…”
Section: Definition Of the Sharing Economymentioning
confidence: 99%