Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1124772.1124950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays

Abstract: Designing collaborative interfaces for tabletops remains difficult because we do not fully understand how groups coordinate their actions when working collaboratively over tables. We present two observational studies of pairs completing independent and shared tasks that investigate collaborative coupling, or the manner in which collaborators are involved and occupied with each other's work. Our results indicate that individuals frequently and fluidly engage and disengage with group activity through several dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
230
3
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
20
230
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Tabletop collaboration has been investigated in terms of territoriality , orientation (Kruger et al, 2004), or coupling styles between individual and group work (Tang et al, 2006). Scott et al (2004) presented three tabletop territories in group collaboration: personal, group, and storage territories; Kruger et al (2004) identified intentional communication with a lack of verbal communication when orienting an object to oneself, to another person, or to the group; and Tang et al (2006) discussed implications for design in terms of supporting fluid transitions between coupling styles.…”
Section: Collaboration With Interactive Surfaces and Tabletopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tabletop collaboration has been investigated in terms of territoriality , orientation (Kruger et al, 2004), or coupling styles between individual and group work (Tang et al, 2006). Scott et al (2004) presented three tabletop territories in group collaboration: personal, group, and storage territories; Kruger et al (2004) identified intentional communication with a lack of verbal communication when orienting an object to oneself, to another person, or to the group; and Tang et al (2006) discussed implications for design in terms of supporting fluid transitions between coupling styles.…”
Section: Collaboration With Interactive Surfaces and Tabletopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scott et al (2004) presented three tabletop territories in group collaboration: personal, group, and storage territories; Kruger et al (2004) identified intentional communication with a lack of verbal communication when orienting an object to oneself, to another person, or to the group; and Tang et al (2006) discussed implications for design in terms of supporting fluid transitions between coupling styles. There are a number of studies of tabletops in public settings focusing on social interaction in groups.…”
Section: Collaboration With Interactive Surfaces and Tabletopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in a cooperative learning task small spaces are suitable for the group activities involving tightly coupled collaboration [15]. The amount of people assigned in each group on top of one table is well-thought-out based on the size of tabletops as well as the game coordination.…”
Section: Serious Game Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, the suggestions for design modifications can be implemented based on the way of collaboration. As in [15], designing collaborative interfaces for tabletops involves understanding of how groups manage their acts over a tabletop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our study we recruited 16 participants (9 male, 7 female), aged between 19 and 47 years (mean: 25.7; SD: 7.07), and grouped them into eight pairs to examine the "collaborative coupling style" between participant pairs [29,30]. 13 of the 16 participants were students from the University of Sydney.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%