2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2020.101620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative filtering over evolution provenance data for interactive visual data exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing the data in Figure 2, it can be seen that the recommended recall rate of the recommendation algorithm based on optimized clustering is 0.42 at the lowest when the number of negative samples is 1 and then increases with the increase of the number of negative samples, with the highest recommended recall rate of 0.62. The highest recall rate of the method in literature [6] is 0.44, and the highest recall rate of the method in literature [7] is 0.44, which is lower than that of this method, which proves that the recommendation effect of the recommendation algorithm based on optimized clustering proposed in this paper is more accurate.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By analyzing the data in Figure 2, it can be seen that the recommended recall rate of the recommendation algorithm based on optimized clustering is 0.42 at the lowest when the number of negative samples is 1 and then increases with the increase of the number of negative samples, with the highest recommended recall rate of 0.62. The highest recall rate of the method in literature [6] is 0.44, and the highest recall rate of the method in literature [7] is 0.44, which is lower than that of this method, which proves that the recommendation effect of the recommendation algorithm based on optimized clustering proposed in this paper is more accurate.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The number of target recommended contents is set to 500. The methods of literature [6], literature [7], and this paper are used to recommend to the target group, respectively. The completion time of 500 recommended contents by the three methods is counted to verify the complexity of different algorithms, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our main contribution, which derived by analyzing the results and findings of the reviewed papers in this report, will be the involvement and usage of the Naïve Bayes classification technique among a certain dataset, which has proved as a feasible approach, based on the preliminary results of an ongoing study that our research group is involved. Further, by analyzing publications covered in this literature survey the following are the main findings: − The content-based filtering (CBF) approach remains the most widely used, in which the items that are recommended are similar to what the user knows (using Similarity), and as emphasized in [58] where collaborative filtering is combined with content-based systems to improve the recommendation results overall. Since the number of items is high while the number of users is low and very few of the users rate the same items, CBF is used to cover cold start and sparsity problem, although CBF also has its limits.…”
Section: Findings and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%