2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21031002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Indoor Positioning Systems: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Research and development in Collaborative Indoor Positioning Systems (CIPSs) is growing steadily due to their potential to improve on the performance of their non-collaborative counterparts. In contrast to the outdoors scenario, where Global Navigation Satellite System is widely adopted, in (collaborative) indoor positioning systems a large variety of technologies, techniques, and methods is being used. Moreover, the diversity of evaluation procedures and scenarios hinders a direct comparison. This paper prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(574 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infrastructurebased Indoor Positioning System (IIPS) (is usually referred to as those systems that need the environment to be sensed to have indoor positioning (e.g., deploying BLE beacons, ultrasound receivers, etc.) Alternatively, Infrastructure-less Indoor Positioning is known as device-based positioning, wherein no additional infrastructure is required to operate, e.g., an indoor positioning system based on inertial measurements or magnetic field [17]. Outdoor positioning capabilities require regional or even global coverage compared to indoor environments, which are limited in size to rooms and buildings.…”
Section: A Indoor Localization Vs Outdoor Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Infrastructurebased Indoor Positioning System (IIPS) (is usually referred to as those systems that need the environment to be sensed to have indoor positioning (e.g., deploying BLE beacons, ultrasound receivers, etc.) Alternatively, Infrastructure-less Indoor Positioning is known as device-based positioning, wherein no additional infrastructure is required to operate, e.g., an indoor positioning system based on inertial measurements or magnetic field [17]. Outdoor positioning capabilities require regional or even global coverage compared to indoor environments, which are limited in size to rooms and buildings.…”
Section: A Indoor Localization Vs Outdoor Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main focus is the algorithm description and assessment rather than its practical implementation, which can be server-based or on-device. In contrast, for cooperative/collaborative systems, the trends suggest that the decentralized approach is the most popular in the recent few years [17].…”
Section: Centralized Localization Vs Distributed Localization Vs Decentralizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of BLE with RSSI measurements for distance estimation has played a relevant role in the last few years. This approach is mainly used in deployments where commercial wearable devices are involved [1]- [4], as its easy implementation on wearable devices and low energy consumption are distinctive advantages [2], [5]. On the downside, the BLE signals' propagation behaviour is highly affected by the environment features, even in LOS conditions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study and implementation of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) wireless signals -transmitted by commercial wearable devices-together with the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) positioning approaches for positioning and tracking people, and sensing human social interaction in indoor environments has grown in the last few years [1]- [4]. Their widespread use and success is mainly due to their ubiquity in wearable devices, straightforward implementation and the energy efficiency of BLE [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are the following methods for determining the location and measuring the coordinates of an object in radio networks [9][10][11]:…”
Section: Review and Analysis Of The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%