1990
DOI: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative investigation of variables in susceptibility testing of yeasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
141
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
141
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Idealmente, las pruebas de sensibilidad antifúngica deben ser fáciles de realizar, con una buena relación coste-eficacia y que proporcionen puntos de corte de las CIM que sean reproducibles y puedan determinarse con prontitud tras un corto período de incubación 19,20 . Para obviar los inconvenientes que se presentan con el uso del método de referencia para levaduras (NCCLS, documento M27-A) por su laboriosidad, nosotros hemos determinado la sensibilidad disminuida al fluconazol mediante un método sensible, pero más rápido y económico, CHROM-FZ.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Idealmente, las pruebas de sensibilidad antifúngica deben ser fáciles de realizar, con una buena relación coste-eficacia y que proporcionen puntos de corte de las CIM que sean reproducibles y puedan determinarse con prontitud tras un corto período de incubación 19,20 . Para obviar los inconvenientes que se presentan con el uso del método de referencia para levaduras (NCCLS, documento M27-A) por su laboriosidad, nosotros hemos determinado la sensibilidad disminuida al fluconazol mediante un método sensible, pero más rápido y económico, CHROM-FZ.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…This variability may be due to important methodological differences among the laboratories (22). The NCCLS antifungal collaborative study using the broth macrodilution method (23), and the microdilution method (24) evaluated the effect of medium, incubation time (24 vs 48 h) and incubation temperature (30°C vs 35°C) on intra and inter-laboratory variations of MIC endpoints. The highest agreement among laboratories, including the rank order of susceptibility, was obtained with RPMI-1640 medium at 35°C and after a 24-h incubation time with antifungal compounds (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yeast cells were collected from the solid medium (MVM); diluted (1:10) in a counting solution containing 0.9% NaCl, 4% formaldehyde, and 4% Tween 20; vortexed to disperse the aggregated cells; and counted in a Neubauer chamber. An initial inoculum density of 10 5 cells ml Ϫ1 was obtained (16). A 0.1-ml aliquot of this suspension was then added to 0.9 ml of MVM broth, giving the desired dilutions of the drug and a final concentration of 10 4 cell ml Ϫ1 (8,14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%