Collaborative memory for categorized lists: ongoing and lasting effects are sensitive to episodic memory tasks

Nie, Aiqing; Ke, Chunchun; Guo, Bingyan; Li, Mengsi; Xiao, Yueyue

doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01684-w

Cited by 11 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In a typical research paradigm of collaborative memory, participants first study a list of items separately and then take a recall test either individually or collaboratively. Research adopting this paradigm has confirmed that people working collaboratively remember more items than individuals working alone (Barnier et al, 2018;Harris et al, 2017;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022. Such findings are in line with the commonsensical saying "strength in numbers. "…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationsupporting

confidence: 72%

“…Scenarios involving at least two people remembering together are termed collaborative memory (Maswood et al, 2019;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022. In a typical research paradigm of collaborative memory, participants first study a list of items separately and then take a recall test either individually or collaboratively.…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the collaborative groups, participants are informed to retrieve collaboratively. The nominal group is equal in size to the collaborative group, and members are randomly assigned to retrieve individually (Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Maswood et al, 2019;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022.…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the quantity of correctly remembered items, collaborative groups perform worse than nominal groups, and this difference is termed collaborative inhibition, a detrimental effect (Barber et al, 2015;Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, , 2022. On the contrary, the number of errors is significantly lower in collaborative versus nominal groups, and this beneficial effect is called error pruning (Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022Rossi-Arnaud et al, 2018).…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The social perspective attaches importance to social factors (e.g., social loafing, social motivation, or social evaluation), but demonstrated little contribution to the effects (Andrews & Rapp, 2015;Kohn & Smith, 2011). A cognitive perspective, the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (RSDH), is widely accepted (Barber et al, 2015;Bärthel et al, 2017;Browning et al, 2018;Nie et al, 2019Nie et al, , 2021Nie et al, , 2022Thorley, 2018; also see Marion & Thorley, 2016, for a review). The RSDH claims that each individual possesses a preexisting cognitive structure, by which an idiosyncratic cognitive organization can be developed for studied events.…”

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Nie¹,

Deng²

2023

ACP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Existing collaborative memory research has shown statistically significant detrimental and beneficial effects (i.e., collaborative inhibition, error pruning, and post-collaborative memory benefit). However, it remains unknown yet whether they are modulated by stimulus emotionality of adjacent stimuli and whether they would differ in distinct memory tasks (item memory vs. source memory). To address these issues, the current study adopted the emotional timeout procedure, where participants individually studied a series of triplets (a preceding neutral word, a modulator word of taboo, nontaboo negative, neutral, or positive emotionality, and a following neutral word) displayed in red or green, and three recall sessions and a surprise recognition test was conducted afterwards. Results revealed reliable beneficial effects of collaboration. (a) The error pruning was reliably observed within ongoing and lasting collaboration in item memory tasks while it faded away post-collaboration in source memory conditions. (b) The post-collaborative memory benefit was confirmed in all word positions. It occurred in taboo, neutral, and positive words for modulators of different emotionality, while that of the preceding and following neutral words were insensitive to the emotionality of the modulator. The effect was only present in item memory, offering compelling evidence for dual-process models. (c) Collaboration facilitated the picked-up effect and the formation of shared memory. However, the detrimental effect of collaborative inhibition was absent in both memory tasks. These findings demonstrated that the mechanisms of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (RSDH) took effect under the emotional timeout procedure to a certain degree.

show abstract

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationsupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Detrimental and Beneficial Effects Of Ongoing Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Nie¹,

Deng²

2023

ACP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Together we lose or gain: Ongoing and enduring impacts of collaboration in episodic memory of emotional DRM lists

Nie

et al. 2022

Curr Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative Memory: What Happens With Remote Communication?

Conte,

Padulo,

Fairfield

2024

Journal of Media Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information and communication technologies have profoundly changed the way people daily remember and discuss opinions and information while interacting and collaborating with common everyday activities such as working, teaching, and studying. Indeed, the rise of Internet connectivity and rapidly expanding social media platforms raises new questions about how false and true memories spread across social connections and is critical to further understanding everyday human memory functioning. Here, we adopted a classic collaborative memory paradigm and investigated memory performance across two different experimental conditions: in-person and computer-mediated communication via video calls on Teams to evaluate the effects of remote collaboration on memory recall. Results showed that individuals who collaborated in presence and individuals who collaborated via computer had comparable memory performance when communication was enriched with verbal and nonverbal cues.

show abstract

Collaborative memory for categorized lists: ongoing and lasting effects are sensitive to episodic memory tasks

Cited by 11 publications

References 62 publications

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Detrimental and Beneficial Effects in Ongoing and Lasting Collaborative Memory: Insight From the Emotional Timeout Procedure

Together we lose or gain: Ongoing and enduring impacts of collaboration in episodic memory of emotional DRM lists

Collaborative Memory: What Happens With Remote Communication?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About