1998
DOI: 10.1145/275269.275275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative suites for experiment-oriented scientific research

Abstract: Collaborations are the essence of science, yet in our information age, most scientific collaborations rely heavily on face-to-face interactions, individual actions, hands-on experimentation, and delayed communications (such as e-mail).For remote collaborations to be as fruitful as sessions with our colleagues down the hall, we need rich communication environments that enable us to focus on knowledge tasks. We also need shared access to primary scientific resources such as instruments, analysis tools, and infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work identifying different types of collaborations (peer-to-peer, mentor-student, interdisciplinary, producer-consumer) and the differences in their communications needs (18) suggests that a VNMRF optimized for peerto-peer interactions may not be optimal for supporting a theoretician working with an NMR collaborator or a student learning a new NMR technique. Thus, in-depth consideration of the requirements for supporting these types of collaborations will undoubtedly suggest additional directions for VNMRF enhancements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work identifying different types of collaborations (peer-to-peer, mentor-student, interdisciplinary, producer-consumer) and the differences in their communications needs (18) suggests that a VNMRF optimized for peerto-peer interactions may not be optimal for supporting a theoretician working with an NMR collaborator or a student learning a new NMR technique. Thus, in-depth consideration of the requirements for supporting these types of collaborations will undoubtedly suggest additional directions for VNMRF enhancements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are certainly differences from working with local colleagues and local spectrometers. Many of these differences such as the lack of nonverbal feedback from body language and the intrusion of technology are well known in the computer-supported cooperative work community and have been discussed elsewhere (18). The overall effect of working remotely on the 750-MHz spectrometer via the VNMRF has been likened by one of us to "driving a Cadillac"; it's a luxury vehicle, but there is no "road feel.…”
Section: Observations After Completing a Series Of Nmr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research" (Schur et al 1998), describes EMSL'S collaborator tools in the SBC project and discusses the dynamics of distributed research groups.…”
Section: Technical Accomplishmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community members come from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, having a shared set of normative and principled beliefs and a set of defined criteria for weighing and validating knowledge in the domain of expertise. As stated by Shur et al [15], collaboration is the essence of science and is a key factor in scientific knowledge construction.…”
Section: Introduction and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%