2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse of a protector species drives secondary endangerment in waterbird communities

Abstract: Interactions and dependence between species can transmit the effects of species declines within and between trophic levels, resulting in secondary endangerments and, in some cases, extinctions. Many mixed-species avian breeding aggregations commonly have a protector species whose aggressive nest defense is used by other species to defend their nests. Disappearance of the protector species may have population demographic consequences on the dependent species. Aggressive nest defense behavior of small colonial g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we accept that our study does not constitute solid proof that raccoon dogs are harmful to duck populations, the results show that it is a numerous, widely spread and frequent potential egg predator, at least at artificial nests. Nevertheless, the long-term duck breeding pair surveys show declining pair trends since 1980s for two of our study areas (Häme and North Savo), indicating changes in the some feature of their breeding habitats and possibly in their predator pressure (Pöysä et al 2017;Pöysä et al 2019; see also Pöysä and Linkola 2021 for the pair trends since 1950s for Häme). Despite the role of American mink implied by other studies of freshwater ducks (Brzezinski et al 2012(Brzezinski et al , 2019Zschille et al 2014), especially on maritime islands (Nordström et al 2002), in this study, the species was rarely encountered and very rarely as an active nest predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…While we accept that our study does not constitute solid proof that raccoon dogs are harmful to duck populations, the results show that it is a numerous, widely spread and frequent potential egg predator, at least at artificial nests. Nevertheless, the long-term duck breeding pair surveys show declining pair trends since 1980s for two of our study areas (Häme and North Savo), indicating changes in the some feature of their breeding habitats and possibly in their predator pressure (Pöysä et al 2017;Pöysä et al 2019; see also Pöysä and Linkola 2021 for the pair trends since 1950s for Häme). Despite the role of American mink implied by other studies of freshwater ducks (Brzezinski et al 2012(Brzezinski et al , 2019Zschille et al 2014), especially on maritime islands (Nordström et al 2002), in this study, the species was rarely encountered and very rarely as an active nest predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Pöysä et al 2013;Fox et al 2016;Lehikoinen et al 2016). In addition, a recent study indicates that the loss of Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus colonies, which provide protection against nest predators, has contributed to the decline of Common Pochard and Tufted Duck breeding numbers in Finland (Pöysä et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such benefits include a reduction of predation risk (Krause and Ruxton , Harrison and Whitehouse ), increased efficiency in finding food (Aplin et al ), enhanced ability to gather information on habitat quality (Seppänen et al ) or increased foraging efficiency (Sridhar et al ). In mixed species colonies, antipredator benefits may be derived not only from a group size effect but also from complementary characteristics of each species in the aggregation (Haemig , Phelps et al ) and may scale with population trends (Pöysä et al ). Many of these benefits may also occur where conspecifics aggregate together, which may serve to maintain coloniality (Lack , Campobello et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%