1981
DOI: 10.2307/2402478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collared Doves (Streptopelia decaocto) in Urban Habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result agrees with Emlen (1974), who noted, in the recent town of Tucson, that some species absent from the periurban landscape live in the urban area. This sort of independence has also been observed in several population level bird studies (Havlin 1962;Erz 1966;Coombs et al 1981;Birkhead 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This result agrees with Emlen (1974), who noted, in the recent town of Tucson, that some species absent from the periurban landscape live in the urban area. This sort of independence has also been observed in several population level bird studies (Havlin 1962;Erz 1966;Coombs et al 1981;Birkhead 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The current distribution (presence/absence) and abundance of Collared Doves in the USA are characterized by environmental factors similar to those in Europe (Coombs et al. 1981, Hengeveld 1988, Beckett et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High human commensalism is a unique attribute of this species. In Britain, its distribution is associated with human settlements such as suburban gardens and town parks with a mixture of shrub and tree cover, including human‐made structures (Coombs et al. 1981, Hengeveld 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore this method gives the duration of the moulting season for the population rather than for an individual. Linear regression analysis of moult scores against date (Method B), used by Evans (1966), Newton (1966), Holmes (1971), Dean (1977) and Coombs et aL (1981), is similar in that the straight line is fitted closely through the mean moult scores for each date. Ginn (1975) and Pimm (1976) noted that this gave an exaggerated estimate for the duration of moult for an individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%