Collecting Survey and Smartphone Sensor Data With an App: Opportunities and Challenges Around Privacy and Informed Consent

Abstract

The new European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) imposes enhanced requirements on digital data collection. This article reports from a 2018 German nationwide population-based probability app study in which participants were asked through a GDPR compliant consent process to share a series of digital trace data, including geolocation, accelerometer data, phone and text messaging logs, app usage, and access to their address books. With about 4,300 invitees and about 650 participants, we demonstrate (1) people were just as willing to share such extensive digital trace data as they were in studies with far more limited requests; (2) despite being provided more decision-related information, participants hardly differentiated between the different data requests made; and (3) once participants gave consent, they did not tend to revoke it. We also show (4) evidence for a widely-held belief that explanations regarding data collection and data usage are often not read carefully, at least not within the app itself, indicating the need for research and user experience improvement to adequately inform and protect participants. We close with suggestions to the field for creating a seal of approval from professional organizations to help the research community promote the safe use of data.

Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: Cross-country survey evidence

“…However, high levels of intended installations may not directly translate into actual installations. Nevertheless, studies often find good correlation between what people declare they would do in surveys and actual behavior [18][19][20][21][22], even in relation to app installations [23][24][25][26]. More generally, broad support for the approach is a necessary first stage to adoption, and our findings about heterogeneity in support point towards specific subgroups of the population that may need stronger encouragements to adoption.…”

Internet of Things and Big Data as enablers for business digitalization strategies

“…Companies must work to protect consumers from the loss of data or privacy, or else risk damaging their own trustworthiness ( Guo et al, 2013 ; Lohachab and Jangra, 2019 ). Despite the profuse impact of IoT on daily life, consumers might lose their willingness to engage with online platforms and mobile devices if their privacy concerns become too great ( Kreuter et al, 2018 ; Taylor et al, 2018 ). Thus, companies are challenged to balance their own interests against users' privacy concerns ( Khan et al, 2018 ; Rastogi and Nath, 2010 ).…”

Missing Data and Other Measurement Quality Issues in Mobile Geolocation Sensor Data

“…Each stage of the model is dependent on success in the previous stage, thus allowing us to rule out more general explanations for missingness and to focus on the occurrence of missing data and the duration of gaps in measurement at the current stage. We use data from the IAB-SMART study in Germany (Kreuter et al, 2018) and focus on four groups of explanatory variables: participant characteristics, device hardware, device state, and temporal and spatial context of the measurement.…”