2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11150-017-9384-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective consumption: an application to the passive drinking effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending Menon et al (2017a), the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) [Banks et al (1997)] is now derived for a collective model including three household members. Let the extended PIGLOG individual expenditure function be where φ( u k ) −1 is decreasing in utility.…”
Section: The Collective Consumption Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extending Menon et al (2017a), the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS) [Banks et al (1997)] is now derived for a collective model including three household members. Let the extended PIGLOG individual expenditure function be where φ( u k ) −1 is decreasing in utility.…”
Section: The Collective Consumption Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work follows this approach to describe how resources are allocated among members of Albanian families, placing special emphasis on the consequences of family splitting due to parental and spousal migration. It uses a collective consumption model based on a complete demand system with price variation and individual Engel effects similar to Arias et al (2004), Menon et al (2017a), and Caiumi and Perali (2014), but extended to estimate the rule governing the distribution of resources between adults (female and male) and children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Menon, Perali and Piccoli (2018) provide a different almost linear formulation of Engel curves that could be approximated similarly to our development below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the demographically modified collective share equation ω i in (53) where ε i is an error term and ln φ * k is the log of individual income modified by a translating household technology as ln φ * k = ln φ k − i t i (d) ln p i the translating demographic functions t i (d) being specified as t i (d) = l τ il ln d l for l = 1 L. This demand system is very similar to a traditional demand system, except for the specification of the income term, which is expressed at individual levels (and not the household level). Following Chavas et al (2014), Dunbar et al (2013), and Menon et al (2017a), individual incomes are derived by partitioning household incomes with a resource share computed using the available information about the observed expenditure on assignable goods, with nonassignable goods assumed to be consumed in equal proportions by each household member. To obtain the sharing rule φ k , we then anchor the income scaling function m k (ψ) to individual total expenditures y k , incorporating the identifying information about assignable consumption as φ k = m k (ψ)y k .…”
Section: Demand System Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%