The Structure and Dynamics of Networks 2011
DOI: 10.1515/9781400841356.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

134
9,179
4
260

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,935 publications
(9,577 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
134
9,179
4
260
Order By: Relevance
“…Most relevant for neuroscience and the connectome are networks measures that evaluate the degree of clustering and modularity (measures of functional segregation), and of path length and communication efficiency (measures of functional integration). In a seminal study (Watts and Strogatz, 1998) discovered that networks combining high clustering of local connections and a short path length due to a small fraction of long-range connections were organized as a "smallworld". In such networks, any node can be reached from any other node in a small number of steps, despite the fact that most nodes form tightly coupled local communities.…”
Section: Brain Structural Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most relevant for neuroscience and the connectome are networks measures that evaluate the degree of clustering and modularity (measures of functional segregation), and of path length and communication efficiency (measures of functional integration). In a seminal study (Watts and Strogatz, 1998) discovered that networks combining high clustering of local connections and a short path length due to a small fraction of long-range connections were organized as a "smallworld". In such networks, any node can be reached from any other node in a small number of steps, despite the fact that most nodes form tightly coupled local communities.…”
Section: Brain Structural Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Christley et al, 2005;Robinson and Christley, 2007) Clustering coefficient The amount of interrelationship that exist between all the nodes and one specific node indicated complicated partnership trade patterns because it implied that when two business partners sent animals to a third location they were also linked by an animal movement (Watts and Strogatz, 1998) Shortest path length diameter…”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortest path length or geodesic distance is the smallest number of links represented by animal movement sets required to travel from holding A to holding B (Watts and Strogatz, 1998) The diameter is the longest geodesic distance (Borgatti and Everett, 1997) Distance measurements of two-mode networks with links between rounds and holdings, must be divided by two to be compared to one-mode measurements Low values suggest that epidemic would spread quickly across the network Assortativity Preference of nodes to attach to others that are similar degree (Newman, 2002) Negative assortativity is dissortativity; high-degree nodes tend to attach to low-degree nodes Community Subset of nodes in which there are significantly more links than expected by chance; group of preferentially linked holdings (Newman, 2006) Betweenness Proportion of geodesic distances (represented by animal movement sets) between all pairs of holdings (excluding node A) that pass through node A (Freeman, 1978(Freeman, /1979 …”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former means that networks tend to have high clustering coefficients [Footnote 1] while keeping low path lengths (Watts and Strogatz, 1998), and the latter implies that link distribution is frequently characterized by a power law, enabling highly connected nodes to appear relatively often. These two characteristics confer interesting properties to networks, like fast transmission and failure tolerance (Motter et al, 2002;Ferrer i Cancho et al, 2005;Steyvers and Tenenbaum, 2005).…”
Section: Semantic Graphs and Complex Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%