2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14481-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Intelligence in Teams – Practical Approaches to Develop Transactive Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 (of 19) strongly agree on liking playing Kahoot! and 13 strongly agree (13) or agree (4) to it being fun to use Kahoot!. 13 strongly agree and 6 agree to liking playing Kahoot!…”
Section: Results From the Norwegian Boysmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 (of 19) strongly agree on liking playing Kahoot! and 13 strongly agree (13) or agree (4) to it being fun to use Kahoot!. 13 strongly agree and 6 agree to liking playing Kahoot!…”
Section: Results From the Norwegian Boysmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is possible to reflect in an action but also on an action, as Schön explains about how one can reflect in action on action. Reflecting after an action is in the military described as After Action Review [12,13]. This After Action Review does, however, only include the two phases after the "Experience" in Kolb's cycle.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concrete experience is not necessarily less concrete when using games. The experience will be reviewed using a form of "After Action Review" (Busch & von der Oelsnitz, 2010) [13]. This includes what can be learned from the experience, and also to suggest what could have been altered regarding a new experience.…”
Section: B Adult Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cyber security teams found in (Tyworth, et al, 2012)). This implies that when deploying distributed teams made up of specialists, organizations should utilize intervention methodologies such as job rotations, feedback sharing, and team training to promote information sharing and improve team dynamics (Busch & von der Oelsnitz, 2011;Hollingshead, 1998;Hsu, Shih, Chiang, & Liu, 2012).…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%