“…see Kieren, Mason, Davis, & Pirie, 1993;Kieren et al, 1999;Kieren, Pirie, & Reid, 1994;Manu & Martin, 2004;Martin, 1999;Martin, Pirie, & Kieren, 1996;Pirie & Kieren, 1989, 1992a, 1992bPirie and Martin, 2000;Thom, 2003;Towers, 1998;Towers, 2001aTowers, , 2001b other researchers have sought to apply the theory to new fields of inquiry. These include teacher preparation (Borgen, 2006;Glanfield, 2004) and the analysis of teachers' growth in understanding school mathematics (Berenson, 2002;Berenson, Cavey, Clark, & Staley, 2001;Borgen, 2006;Cavey & Berenson, 2005;McDougall & Nason, 2005), teacher actions (Warner & Schorr, 2004;Warner, Schorr, Samuels, & Gearhart, 2005), the growth of mathematical understanding in the context of bilingualism (Manu, 2005a(Manu, , 2005bManu & Martin, 2004), the nature of collective mathematical understanding (Droujkova, Berenson, Slaten, & Tombes, 2005;Martin, Towers, & Pirie, 2006;Thom, 2004;Towers & Davis, 2002;, and workplace training (Martin & LaCroix, in press;Martin, LaCroix, & Fownes, 2006). Pirie and Kieren (1991) defined folding back as A person functioning at an outer level of understanding when challenged may invoke or fold back to inner, perhaps more specific local or intuitive understandings.…”