2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01772.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective memory and management of the past: the entrepreneurs of civil war memory in post‐war Lebanon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout the political transitions of the last 20 years, the marching season has been a challenge to the peace process as a constant reminder that, despite political agreements, people and parties departed from different historical positions and are in transition to different future destinations. In contemporary terms, 'competitive commemoration' (McBride 2001) continues to be a constant fixture, where 'memory entrepreneurs' (Pollak 2000;Abou Assi 2010cf: Haugbolle 2010Byrne et al 2012;Holyfield and Beacham 2011) peddle selective, partisan accounts (both activating and actively forgetting the past) to construct a meaningful connection between past, present and future, to ensure that they will be 'tomorrow's ancestors' (McCrone 1998). In this respect, it is also worth noting that traditional organisations to a certain extent have been eclipsed by different configurations of 'memory entrepreneurs' highlighting the dynamic between political power, compromises and cultural practices.…”
Section: Paradingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Throughout the political transitions of the last 20 years, the marching season has been a challenge to the peace process as a constant reminder that, despite political agreements, people and parties departed from different historical positions and are in transition to different future destinations. In contemporary terms, 'competitive commemoration' (McBride 2001) continues to be a constant fixture, where 'memory entrepreneurs' (Pollak 2000;Abou Assi 2010cf: Haugbolle 2010Byrne et al 2012;Holyfield and Beacham 2011) peddle selective, partisan accounts (both activating and actively forgetting the past) to construct a meaningful connection between past, present and future, to ensure that they will be 'tomorrow's ancestors' (McCrone 1998). In this respect, it is also worth noting that traditional organisations to a certain extent have been eclipsed by different configurations of 'memory entrepreneurs' highlighting the dynamic between political power, compromises and cultural practices.…”
Section: Paradingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Asmal et al 1996). In this context, commemoration and memorialisation often work to enhance and reinforce exclusive group solidarities (Abou Assi 2010;McDowel and Braniff 2014). The study of peace processes thus demands specific understandings of the role of history and memory as conflict dynamics, as well as strategies for studying these as both critical events and as critical continuities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The analytical vocabulary frequently employed when researching and discussing issues related to historical memory is imbued with expressions which largely appertain to the corporativist-marketizing-neoliberal jargon. Literature speaks for example about the 'management of the past' (Tunbridge and Ashworth, 1996;Abou Assi, 2010) or about 'memory governance' (Hourcade, 2015: 95), the actors involved in this process of management are seen as 'mnemonic/memory entrepreneurs' (e.g. Levy and Sznaider, 2010: 136;Kubik and Bernhard, 2014: 9, 25;Jelin, 2003;Abou Assi, 2010;Sierp and Wüstenberg, 2015;Neumeyer, 2017) or 'memory stakeholders' (Hourcade, 2015: 93).…”
Section: Memory and Neoliberalism: Concurrent Unfoldingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature speaks for example about the 'management of the past' (Tunbridge and Ashworth, 1996;Abou Assi, 2010) or about 'memory governance' (Hourcade, 2015: 95), the actors involved in this process of management are seen as 'mnemonic/memory entrepreneurs' (e.g. Levy and Sznaider, 2010: 136;Kubik and Bernhard, 2014: 9, 25;Jelin, 2003;Abou Assi, 2010;Sierp and Wüstenberg, 2015;Neumeyer, 2017) or 'memory stakeholders' (Hourcade, 2015: 93). Furthermore, steered by such entrepreneurs or stakeholders, memories and memory discourses are often understood as being in a state of competition with each other and hence vying for pre-eminence, even if important critical pleas against such interpretative frameworks have also been brought to the fore (Rothberg, 2009).…”
Section: Memory and Neoliberalism: Concurrent Unfoldingsmentioning
confidence: 99%