2013
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2013.00026.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

College Student Utilization of a Comprehensive Psychiatric Emergency Program

Abstract: The authors sought to identify college students at risk for experiencing a mental health crisis that warranted a psychiatric evaluation at a hospital and/or a psychiatric hospitalization. A retrospective chart review of college students evaluated at a comprehensive psychiatric emergency program during a 1‐year period was conducted. Demographic variables, mental health treatment history, diagnosis, and hospital discharge plans were found to predict those students likely to be hospitalized and those likely to ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychological distress (as measured by Adult Self-Report and the DSM-IV) was the only significant predictor for the clinical group (63,64), whereas depression (as measured by Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] and Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), anxiety (as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory and PHQ-9), and psychological distress (as measured by the dysphoria domain of the Trauma Symptom Inventory) were each significant predictors of service use among the general (nonclinical) young adult population (26,43,51,60,65). Notably, probable diagnoses of depression (based on CES-D screening) significantly increased the odds of service use in the longer term among the nonclinical group (Table 2).…”
Section: Predisposing Enabling and Need Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological distress (as measured by Adult Self-Report and the DSM-IV) was the only significant predictor for the clinical group (63,64), whereas depression (as measured by Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] and Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), anxiety (as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory and PHQ-9), and psychological distress (as measured by the dysphoria domain of the Trauma Symptom Inventory) were each significant predictors of service use among the general (nonclinical) young adult population (26,43,51,60,65). Notably, probable diagnoses of depression (based on CES-D screening) significantly increased the odds of service use in the longer term among the nonclinical group (Table 2).…”
Section: Predisposing Enabling and Need Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators of early intensive service use were key variables in predicting higher costs, which is consistent with other studies. [30][31][32] One limitation is the circularity of patients being more likely to receive greater service input if they have already received it previously (for example commencement of psychological therapy in the prediction window naturally predicting its continuation after the index date). There may also be confounding by the disorder severity influencing the level of staff contact.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Our Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most agree that there are situations where hospitalization is warranted and/or should be considered (e.g., Chiles & Strosahl, 2005; Jobes, 2006; Linehan, 1993; Mitchell, Kader, Haggerty, Bakhai, & Warren, 2013). In the absence of clear empirical guidance, however, these decisions must be made on an individual basis as opposed to being made as a matter of policy.…”
Section: The Case Against Hospitalization As a Standard Of Care For Smentioning
confidence: 99%