2012
DOI: 10.5139/ijass.2012.13.4.474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision Avoidance Maneuver Planning Using GA for LEO and GEO Satellite Maintained in Keeping Area

Abstract: In this paper, a collision avoidance maneuver was sought for low Earth orbit (LEO) and geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) satellites maintained in a keeping area. A genetic algorithm was used to obtain both the maneuver start time and the delta-V to reduce the probability of collision with uncontrolled space objects or debris. Numerical simulations demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed algorithm for both LEO satellites and GEO satellites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Φ is linear transformation and (14) do hold, the necessary and sufficient condition of the nonzero solution existence of X 0 is 1 = 2 ≡ (the initial relative position is nonzero). Thus,…”
Section: Theorem 2 If the Initial Relative Distance Of Pursuer And Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since Φ is linear transformation and (14) do hold, the necessary and sufficient condition of the nonzero solution existence of X 0 is 1 = 2 ≡ (the initial relative position is nonzero). Thus,…”
Section: Theorem 2 If the Initial Relative Distance Of Pursuer And Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bombardelli [13] obtained an optimal maneuver method to numerically maximize the miss distance, which described the arc length separation between the maneuvering rear point and the predicted collision point. Recently, the study of evasive maneuvers has been done with different emphasis, Lee et al [14,15] used genetic algorithm to find a solution of minimum fuel consumption and to determine delta-V maneuvers in LEO and GEO. de Jesus and de Sousa [16] investigated the existence of symmetry in determining the initial conditions of collisions among objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantage matrix -Building the advantage matrix which represents the preference of behaviors -Easy to interpret -High cost for building matrix [4], [5] Genetic algorithm -Exploring the solution space to improve particular objectives -Long time to obtain solutions -Local optimum [6], [7], [8], [9] Reinforcement learning -Finding an optimal policy that maximize total future reward -Global optimum -Difficult to define reward for each behavior [10], [11], [12] Matrix factorization -Estimating latent factors that explain the implcit attributes of state features -Latent factor -Robust to the data sparseness [13] timal behavior by using a predefined situation-behavior (SB) matrix [4], [5], [14]. The results obtained by the methods are easy to interpret because optimal behavior is identified by comparing values of elements in the given AM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another line of research addresses the optimal behavior inference problem using a genetic algorithm (GA), which improves their objectives by sufficiently exploring the solution space [6], [7], [15], [16]. Although GA did not require building a matrix, chromosome and crossover/mutation schemes should be predefined to perform the algorithm [8], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic algorithm is an iterative scheme where the population is modified using the best features of the 'genes' from previous generations. The selection, crossover and mutation operators are applied to identify the best solution [6,12,13].…”
Section: Global Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%