Advanced Vehicle Control AVEC’16 2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315265285-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision avoidance system using state dependent Riccati equation technique: An experimental robustness evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The components of the tire slip are calculated by expressions, which include linear and angular velocities calculated by the equation system (1). These expressions are omitted here and can be found in [14].…”
Section: Model Of Vehicle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The components of the tire slip are calculated by expressions, which include linear and angular velocities calculated by the equation system (1). These expressions are omitted here and can be found in [14].…”
Section: Model Of Vehicle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two regulator types are derived from models of controlled plants. In application to automated vehicle driving, these regulators, being accompanied by rather advanced and complex observers of vehicle dynamic parameters, show good performance even in emergency maneuvers at low adhesion surfaces [1,2]. LQR and MPC require parameters of the controlled plant to be known (identified).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature on the automated path-tracking control, a number of adaptive control techniques are described and proposed including scheduled gain PID regulators [17], model-based optimal regulators [18], fuzzy logic [19], and sliding mode regulators [20]. Selection of the regulator type for using in this work can be found in [21].…”
Section: Path-tracking Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which results in A(x(t)) = 0.1x(t),dA(x(t))/dx(t) = 0.1, B = À 1, dB/dx(t) = 0, R = 0.1, Q = 10, F = 10. Substituting parameters in (9), a nonlinear PDE is found (21) will be subjected to changes based on FDM and the MOL in (13) to (15), to finally achieve the difference equation (16). Time of simulation was set t f = 1s, a = 1, n x = 0.01, n t = 0.00005, and r = 0.5.…”
Section: Scalar Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The first point is that (15) must be substituted in (13) to approximate time derivative of gain. • Counters in the loops start from 1, though the state is bounded between a negative and a positive value.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%