2018
DOI: 10.1002/mma.4884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collocation‐variation difference schemes for differential‐algebraic equations

Abstract: We consider the initial value problem in linear differential-algebraic equations and highlight the difficulties of the construction of numerical methods for these problems. We propose one-step difference schemes based on the collocation-variational approach and show the principal difference between these algorithms and the known difference schemes. The analysis of the particular cases of such schemes are given. KEYWORDS differential-algebraic equations, difference schemes | INTRODUCTIONA number of applied prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, it is planned to construct and justify numerical methods for solving such systems. These algorithms are supposed to be based on the extrapolation formulas [67], which have performed well when solving IAEs Equation (30), on the special quadrature formula of the midpoint type [58,59], and on the collocation-variational approach that was proposed for the numerical solution to differential-algebraic equations [72][73][74][75]. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, it is planned to construct and justify numerical methods for solving such systems. These algorithms are supposed to be based on the extrapolation formulas [67], which have performed well when solving IAEs Equation (30), on the special quadrature formula of the midpoint type [58,59], and on the collocation-variational approach that was proposed for the numerical solution to differential-algebraic equations [72][73][74][75]. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%