2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014wr016094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colloid particle size‐dependent dispersivity

Constantinos V. Chrysikopoulos,
Vasileios E. Katzourakis

Abstract: Laboratory and field studies have demonstrated that dispersion coefficients evaluated by fitting advection-dispersion transport models to nonreactive tracer breakthrough curves do not adequately describe colloid transport under the same flow field conditions. Here an extensive laboratory study was undertaken to assess whether the dispersivity, which traditionally has been considered to be a property of the porous medium, is dependent on colloid particle size and interstitial velocity. A total of 48 colloid tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger particles experience more irregular movements induced by the limit of pore size and lead to a larger dispersivity (Figure b), which is in agreement with the theoretical model of Jourak et al () and the experimental results of Bennacer et al (). As a result, the dispersivity of SPs ( α d range: 0.19–0.45 cm) is generally higher than that of DT ( α d range: 0.19–0.26 cm) for the two particles ( D 50 = 25 and 47 μm), especially at lower temperatures ( T = 15–30°C; Figure a), but the difference becomes smaller with increasing temperature, indicating that the dispersion coefficients of DT are inherently different from that of SP (Ahfir et al, ; Chrysikopoulos & Katzourakis, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Larger particles experience more irregular movements induced by the limit of pore size and lead to a larger dispersivity (Figure b), which is in agreement with the theoretical model of Jourak et al () and the experimental results of Bennacer et al (). As a result, the dispersivity of SPs ( α d range: 0.19–0.45 cm) is generally higher than that of DT ( α d range: 0.19–0.26 cm) for the two particles ( D 50 = 25 and 47 μm), especially at lower temperatures ( T = 15–30°C; Figure a), but the difference becomes smaller with increasing temperature, indicating that the dispersion coefficients of DT are inherently different from that of SP (Ahfir et al, ; Chrysikopoulos & Katzourakis, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For spherical particles, the molecular diffusion coefficient is determined by the Stokes‐Einstein diffusion equation (Chrysikopoulos & Katzourakis, ): DAB=kBTabs3normalπμBdp …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The factor by which the dispersion coefficient in the field is greater than in the laboratory ranges from 1 to 10,000 for observation scales from 5 to 2000 m [55,59]. In addition to the effect of medium length scale [60], it has been reported recently that the dispersivity will also increase with NPs size [61]. Therefore, for this reason the dispersion coefficient ( ) of NPs at the field scale is assumed to be comparatively larger (∼10 −5 m 2 /s) in magnitude than the diffusion coefficient for NPs at the laboratory scale (∼10 −8 m 2 /s for a NP with a diameter of 10 nm), which can be obtained using the Stokes-Einstein equation as follows:…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Dispersion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%