2018
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2017-0447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colloquium 2016: Assessment of subsurface thermal conductivity for geothermal applications

Abstract: The construction of green buildings using geothermal energy requires knowledge of the ground thermal conductivity, assessed when designing the heating and cooling system of commercial buildings with ground-coupled heat pumps. The most commonly used method for active field assessment is the thermal response test (TRT), which consists of circulating heated water in a pilot ground heat exchanger (GHE) where temperature and flow rate are monitored. The transient thermal perturbation is analyzed to evaluate the sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsurface thermal conductivity can be deduced with different approaches, presented below in order of increasing reliability and representativeness: laboratory analysis on samples collected from outcrops, drilled cuttings or cores; passive in situ analysis based on the interpretation of geophysical signals; and active heat transfer experiments conduct in the field such as thermal response tests (TRTs; Raymond, 2018). The cost of each method generally increases with reliability and representativeness.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsurface thermal conductivity can be deduced with different approaches, presented below in order of increasing reliability and representativeness: laboratory analysis on samples collected from outcrops, drilled cuttings or cores; passive in situ analysis based on the interpretation of geophysical signals; and active heat transfer experiments conduct in the field such as thermal response tests (TRTs; Raymond, 2018). The cost of each method generally increases with reliability and representativeness.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivity assessments were made with two different methods: (1) a needle probe for hard rocks [12,[28][29][30] and (2) the modified transient plane source (MTPS) method for friable rocks [30][31][32]. The KD2 Pro unit [33], part of a standardized method under the ASTM D5334 norm, was used for the needle probe analysis with gabbro samples, while the C-therm heating plate following the ASTM D7984 norm was used for the MTPS analysis with shales and calcarenites [34].…”
Section: Laboratory Measurement Of Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same field test methodology was applied to both sites, but the heat injection rate was adapted according to heating cable design to achieve a low-power requirement. [26]).…”
Section: Field Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat injection rate of heating cables used for previous tests varied from 20 to 40 W•m −1 [23,24] and the required power of less than 1 kW was supplied by connecting the TRT unit to the electrical grid [24]. Tests with a continuous heating cable wete achieved in boreholes having a depth of approximately 30 m, while boreholes with more than 100 m in length have been the subject of tests with heating sections to keep a low power requirement [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%