2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.2006.00258.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the oral cavity

Abstract: Permanent colonization of LGG in the oral cavity is improbable but seems possible in individual cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
95
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
95
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This strain could only temporally be detected, but did not colonise the oral cavity. The authors concluded, that colonisation with this strain is improbable, but possible in some cases [30]. In a clinical study, the application of a chewable tablet of L. reuteri ATCC 55730 (10 8 CFU/ tablet) for 2 weeks did not lead to permanent colonisation of the oral cavity [31].…”
Section: Strain Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This strain could only temporally be detected, but did not colonise the oral cavity. The authors concluded, that colonisation with this strain is improbable, but possible in some cases [30]. In a clinical study, the application of a chewable tablet of L. reuteri ATCC 55730 (10 8 CFU/ tablet) for 2 weeks did not lead to permanent colonisation of the oral cavity [31].…”
Section: Strain Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In L. plantarum WCFS1 a lectin-like mannose-specific adhesin that interacts with the host intestinal tract has also been described [29]. It is expected, that bacteria, intended as oral probiotics, should adhere to and colonise surfaces of the oral cavity [30]. Yli-Knuuttila et al investigated whether L. rhamnosus GG could be detected in the oral cavity after discontinuation of administration of a probiotic product.…”
Section: Strain Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A loss of L. reuteri colonization was observed by Wolf et al (23) two months after having discontinued probiotic use. L. rhamnosus GG administration and oral cavity colonization was studied by Yli-Knuuttila et al (24); the authors concluded that permanent colonization in oral cavity was unlikely (although possible in some cases) and suggested the probiotic to be used on a regular basis. Binding strength of 17 Lactobacillus strains and 7 bifidobacteria strains to saliva and oral mucous membrane was variable in different strains, according to a study by Haukioja et al (25); such a strength variation caused an increased residence time of probiotic in oral cavity.…”
Section: Residence Time Of Probiotics In Oral Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that permanent colonization in oral cavity was unlikely (although possible in some cases) and suggested the probiotic to be used on a regular basis. [45] Binding strength of 17 Lactobacillus strains and 7 bifidobacteria strains to saliva and oral mucous membrane was variable in different strains, according to a study by Haukioja et al in 2006, such a strength variation caused an increased residence time of probiotic in oral cavity. [46] Latency time of probiotic S. salivarius K12, 4 tablets/day for 3 days, was assessed in several oral cavity areas in a 35-day follow-up, by Horz et al (2007) probiotic could be found on oral mucous membrane, tongue and in stimulated saliva for more than 3 weeks, with a gradually reduced S. salivarius K12 level being detected beginning 8 days after treatment withdrawal.…”
Section: Residence Time Of Probiotics In Oral Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%