Embracing new alternative feed ingredients in feed formulation is an essential component of future sustainable intensification of feed production. Furthermore identification of alternative raw materials is a means of increasing resilience in the supply chain in the face of increased risk due to the pending unreliability of climate. Appreciating the gap between the identification of an alternative raw material and the approval of this material in a commercial raw material data matrix is imperative to a successful adoption of the new product. In this presentation the presumption is made that any new raw material is listed in a national list of permitted raw materials. It is not the intention to review regulatory issues. Unfortunately however it does not follow that a material listed for use in feed in a national list is then used routinely in feed formulation. How a raw material is used can be viewed in terms of either animal factors and/or logistic and commercial factors. The presence of anti-nutritional factors can have a significant impact on how a new raw material is utilised. Independently it can influence the species of animal, the age and stage of growth of an animal and the quantity of material used in the formulation. Furthermore traditional nutrient components such as phytate and fibre are now recognised as antinutritional factors in for example poultry and aqua nutrition respectively. Means of eliminating or negating the impact of anti-nutritional factors is an important aspect of developing an alternative raw material. Least cost ration formulation techniques have been developed to design diets that meet specific requirements from readily available ingredients at the lowest cost. Invariably a new ingredient will only be used in a diet formulation as long as it will reduce the cost of the diet unless the ingredient can provide additional benefits not taken into account in the least cost formulation. This would be the case when a product delivers health benefits in addition to its nutrient specification. A new raw material may satisfy all major nutrient requirements but in addition a number of logistic issues require to be fulfilled. The product must be produced in a quantity to support a supply chain and to be incorporated in one or a number of feed formulations to merit a feed mill allocating space in the mill for storage. Finally the benefit of using the new alternative feed material must create sufficient value to be attractive to the producer of the product, all the active members in the supply chain and finally the livestock producer who will use the product. Biorefineries processing large quantities of grain for biofuels are prime examples of processes capable of producing novel raw materials. Currently the biorefinery process tends to produce a single medium protein, high fibre co-product, distillers dried grains and solubles (DDGS). It is questionable whether this process is viable when large quantities of energy are required to dry the product for feeding to ruminants, the segment of livestock ...