Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies

Abstract

Summary1. We estimate colony reproductive success, in numbers of offspring colonies arising from a colony's daughter queens, of colonies of the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. 2. A measure of lifetime reproductive success is essential to understand the relation of ecological factors, phenotype and fitness in a natural population. This was possible for the first time in a natural population of ant colonies using data from long-term study of a population of colonies in south-eastern Arizona, for which ages of all colonies are known from census data collected since 1985. 3. Parentage analyses of microsatellite data from 5 highly polymorphic loci were used to assign offspring colonies to maternal parent colonies in a population of about 265 colonies, ages 1-28 years, sampled in 2010. 4. The estimated population growth rate R o was 1Á69 and generation time was 7Á8 years. There was considerable variation among colonies in reproductive success: of 199 possible parent colonies, only 49 (~25%) had offspring colonies on the site. The mean number of offspring colonies per maternal parent colony was 2Á94 and ranged from 1 to 8. A parent was identified for the queen of 146 of 247 offspring colonies. There was no evidence for reproductive senescence; fecundity was about the same throughout the 25-30 year lifespan of a colony. 5. There were no trends in the distance or direction of the dispersal of an offspring relative to its maternal parent colony. There was no relationship between the number of gynes produced by a colony in 1 year and the number of offspring colonies subsequently founded by its daughter reproductive females. 6. The results provide the first estimate of a life table for a population of ant colonies and the first estimate of the female component of colony lifetime reproductive success. The results suggest that commonly used measures of reproductive output may not be correlated with realized reproductive success. This is the starting point for future investigation asking whether variation in reproductive success is related to phenotypic variation among colonies in behavioural and ecological traits.

Ant–plant mutualism: a dietary by‐product of a tropical ant's macronutrient requirements

“…The results of this experiment add to those of earlier studies of ants that found that colony fitness can be inferred by the mass of adult reproductives and colony size (Gordon , Deslippe and Savolainen , Wagner and Gordon , but see Ingram et al. ).…”

An Organismal Perspective on the Evolution of Insect Societies

“…Despite the analogy, comprehensive studies of colony level life-histories remain few (but see e.g., Cole, 2009;Ingram et al, 2013), and the life-span reproduction trade-offs have not been intensely studied at the colony level. The superorganismal perspective is further justified by the observation that at the lower level of individuals within colonies social insects break the tradeoffs that apply to solitary organisms.…”

Gene expression variation in the brains of harvester ant foragers is associated with collective behavior

“…Morepronounced physiological variation among colonies would probably be detected if biogenic amine levels were quantified at the brain-region scale, or if gene expression patterns were quantified at the single-cell scale 51 . It would be interesting to examine the association between variation in the traits measured here and colony fitness, and relatedness among colonies, as in previous work 9,52 . However, we do not have fitness estimates for this set of colonies.…”