2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(01)91429-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colored noise and computational inference in fMRI time series analysis: resampling methods in time and wavelet domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (12), it is seen that the wavelet coefficients at level are with the same variance . Hence, the submatrix at level is of identical value at the diagonal and of dimension .…”
Section: B Fractional Noise Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From (12), it is seen that the wavelet coefficients at level are with the same variance . Hence, the submatrix at level is of identical value at the diagonal and of dimension .…”
Section: B Fractional Noise Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2) Fractional Noise: To investigate the effect of fractional noise or -like noise, we first synthesize realizations of fBm noise based on the statistical model of fBm using the method introduced in [12]. The total length of the simulated fBm noise is with the decomposition level (since ).…”
Section: A Simulated Data 1) Time-varying Variance Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatially it is used to obtain a sparse representation of the activation map and then the statistical significance of activation is computed on these wavelet coefficients [VBU06]. Alternatively, along the temporal dimension, wavelets are used for de‐noising and whitening the time‐series data [BLS*01] and activity estimation [Mey03].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has become clear that there is a nonlinear relationship between the variation in the fMRI signal and the stimulus presentation [21]; and the hemodynamic response function (HRF) varies spatially and between subjects [22]. Moreover, the structure of noise in fMRI is not well understood and remains a contentious subject [3]. Thus, the validity of the statistical models depends on the extent to which the data satisfies the underlying assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%