1999
DOI: 10.1006/jctb.1999.1910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coloring Graphs with Sparse Neighborhoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
212
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
13
212
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We omit the detailed proof. Some extensions of this result have recently been proved in [5] and [23].…”
Section: Separated Eigenvalues and Sparse Neighborhoodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We omit the detailed proof. Some extensions of this result have recently been proved in [5] and [23].…”
Section: Separated Eigenvalues and Sparse Neighborhoodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Another proof is divided into two cases: every graph with maximum degree at most √ n has independence number Ω( √ n); on the other hand, if some vertex in the Delaunay graph has degree exceeding √ n, then its neighborhood would contain a monotone chain 1 All rectangles and boxes are axis-parallel in this paper. 2 The O or Ω notation hides log O(1) n and log O(1) m factors in this paper.…”
Section: Main Results On Points Wrt Rectangles In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second proof can be refined to yield a slight improvement cf-color(n, B 2 ) = O( n/ log n) by using better bounds on the independence number of graphs with sparse neighborhoods [2], as several researchers have independently observed [19,24].…”
Section: Main Results On Points Wrt Rectangles In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These proofs use a union bound over M = 2 Θ(N ) undesired events, by giving a 2 −Ω(N ) upper-bound on the probability of each of these events. 4 Unfortunately, there exist poly (log(N ))-wise independent graphs where any event that occurs with positive probability, has probability ≥ 2 −o(N ) . Therefore, directly 'de-randomizing' the original proof fails, and alternative arguments (suitable for the k-wise independent case) are provided.…”
Section: Our Techniques and Relations To Combinatorial Pseudorandomnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More surprisingly, k = Θ(log(N )) suffices to capture a similar upper-bound (even for tiny densities p = c log(N )/N ). This upper-bound is based on Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov's [3], [4] and on Johansson's [27].…”
Section: Coloring (See Section 55)mentioning
confidence: 99%