Columbia, 1930–58

Abel, Christopher; Marco, Palacio

doi:10.1017/chol9780521266529.011

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Brazil, the authoritarian regime established by Getúlio Vargas in 1937, the Estado Novo, albeit strongly influenced by Portugal's dictatorship, explicitly refers to the New Deal as its source of inspiration (Lewis 2008). In Colombia, many young liberals who supported the so-called Marching Revolution (Revolución en Marcha) -the reformist period between 1934 and 1948 led by Alfonso López Pumarejo -took FDR's New Deal as a model of what modern policies should be (Abel and Palacios 1991).…”

Section: Latin America's New Dealmentioning

confidence: 99%

The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era

Román

2018

Rev. bras. polít. int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Latin America's New Dealmentioning

confidence: 99%

The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era

Román

2018

Rev. bras. polít. int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

From Populism to Neoliberalism: The Political Economy of Latin American Import-Substitution Industrialization: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and Colombia in Comparative Perspective

Grinberg¹

2022

Latin American Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional views on Latin American political development agree that its distinctive characteristics are in some way related to the region’s pattern of import-substitution industrialization. All of them share a key theoretical perspective that limits their understanding of this development: they consider capital accumulation to be structured at the national level. Instead, import-substitution industrialization should be seen as the state-mediated form of recovery by global industrial capital invested in manufacturing of a portion of the ground rent flowing into the region because of its role in the production of surplus value on a global scale. The differences in the political economy of import-substitution industrialization between Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia may be explained in terms of the historical and natural conditions of the specific form taken by capitalism in Latin America. Las opiniones tradicionales sobre el desarrollo político latinoamericano coinciden en que sus peculiaridades están de alguna manera relacionadas con el patrón de industrialización por sustitución de importaciones de la región. Se comparte una perspectiva teórica clave que limita la comprensión de dicho desarrollo: la acumulación de capital se presenta como estructurada a nivel nacional. Sin embargo, la industrialización por sustitución de importaciones debe verse como la forma mediada por el estado que toma la recuperación, por parte del capital industrial global invertido en el sector manufacturero, de una porcion de la renta del suelo que fluye hacia la región debido a su papel en la producción de plusvalía a escala mundial, y va mediada por el Estado. Las diferencias en la economía política de la industrialización por sustitución de importaciones entre Argentina, Brasil, México y Colombia pueden explicarse en términos de las condiciones históricas y naturales en que se realiza la forma específica que toma el capitalismo en América Latina.

show abstract

Columbia, 1930–58

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era

The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era

From Populism to Neoliberalism: The Political Economy of Latin American Import-Substitution Industrialization: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and Colombia in Comparative Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About