2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Column axial load effects on the performance of skewed SMF RBS connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical investigations demonstrated adequate flexural capacity. Up to a 20° skew angle, increases in column twist and column flange yielding were minimal (Prinz and Richards, 2016;Desrochers et al, 2018). At a 30° skew angle, the torsional demands and yielding effects were more pronounced.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The numerical investigations demonstrated adequate flexural capacity. Up to a 20° skew angle, increases in column twist and column flange yielding were minimal (Prinz and Richards, 2016;Desrochers et al, 2018). At a 30° skew angle, the torsional demands and yielding effects were more pronounced.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The recent numerical studies investigating bare-steel skewed moment frame connections ( [1], [2]) suggest adequate moment capacity and little deviation in behaviour from orthogonal connection configurations. In [1] and [2], only slight increases in column twist and column flange yielding were observed at skews of up to 20 degrees, with larger torsional and yielding effects noticed at higher skew angles (30 degrees). Commentary in the current AISC provisions for prequalified connections [3] cites the research of [1] in the commentary, stating that "skew angles of less than 5° to 10° might be considered acceptable in reduced beam section connections".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the mechanical performance of AM 17-4 PH steel components in ULCF is needed for the development of optimized energy dissipative components subjected to large repeated strains (such as yielding dampers and structural fuse elements in buildings during seismic loading) [18]. ULCF fracture processes are fundamentally different than those in the HCF regime as they form through a process of micro-void growth and coalescence during material yielding [19][20][21][22][23]. Komotori et al [21] studied the effect of low ductility metal (cast iron) grain size under ULCF, where internal fractures were driven by micro-void coalescence via detachment of the matrix from the interstitial carbon inclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%