2011
DOI: 10.1080/00048400903524375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combating Anti Anti-Luck Epistemology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He goes even further to conclude that knowledge is present in Gettier cases. For a recent criticism of Hetherington on these points, see Madison (2011). It is worth pointing out that anti-luck epistemologists can agree with Hetherington that Case 2 is a case of lucky knowledge while denying that the case is lucky in a way that is, by reference to veritic luck, incompatible with knowledge.…”
Section: Tension With E-paritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…He goes even further to conclude that knowledge is present in Gettier cases. For a recent criticism of Hetherington on these points, see Madison (2011). It is worth pointing out that anti-luck epistemologists can agree with Hetherington that Case 2 is a case of lucky knowledge while denying that the case is lucky in a way that is, by reference to veritic luck, incompatible with knowledge.…”
Section: Tension With E-paritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jokester, however, overlooked the doctor's appointment, leaving the original and correct time intact. 7 For a sample of some explicit statements on this point, see for example Swain (1978), Lewis (1996), Kvanvig (2003Kvanvig ( , 2004, Pritchard (2003Pritchard ( , 2004Pritchard ( , 2005Pritchard ( , 2007Pritchard ( , 2009), Steup (2008), Luper (2010), Madison (2011), Kelp (2012a), Jarvis (2012), Carter (2010Carter ( , 2011 and Carter, Jarvis & Rubin (2012a, 2012b). This list is far from exhaustive.…”
Section: Parity and Epistemic Luckmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If you're looking for reasons to be skeptical of the suggestion that knowledge is an achievement, Hacker (2013), Lackey (2007), and Whiting (2012) are good places to look. 5 For arguments for the malignancy of epistemic luck, see Engel (1992), Madison (2011), andPritchard (2005). For a discussion of the difference between intervening and environmental luck, see Jarvis (forthcoming) and Pritchard (2009b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%