2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206360109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of glycolysis inhibition with chemotherapy results in an antitumor immune response

Abstract: Most DNA-damaging agents are weak inducers of an anticancer immune response. Increased glycolysis is one of the best-described hallmarks of tumor cells; therefore, we investigated the impact of glycolysis inhibition, using 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), in combination with cytotoxic agents on the induction of immunogenic cell death. We demonstrated that 2DG synergized with etoposide-induced cytotoxicity and significantly increased the life span of immunocompetent mice but not immunodeficient mice. We then established t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Nonetheless, at least some anticancer agents display an optimal efficacy in the presence of an intact immune system, but not when mice lack T cells, dendritic cells (DCs), several other effectors of innate and adaptive immunity or when they are treated with a CD11b-specific antibody that blocks the extravasation of DC precursors. [2][3][4][5][6] These results point to a hitherto poorly understood role for anticancer immune responses in determining the long-term success of chemotherapy, a notion that is in line with abundant clinical data indicating that tumor infiltration by cytotoxic T lymphocytes influences disease outcome. [7][8][9][10] Cancer cells respond to some chemotherapeutics such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin by undergoing an immunogenic form of cell death, meaning that such dying cells become able to induce a potent cellular immune response on subcutaneous injection into immunocompetent mice.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Nonetheless, at least some anticancer agents display an optimal efficacy in the presence of an intact immune system, but not when mice lack T cells, dendritic cells (DCs), several other effectors of innate and adaptive immunity or when they are treated with a CD11b-specific antibody that blocks the extravasation of DC precursors. [2][3][4][5][6] These results point to a hitherto poorly understood role for anticancer immune responses in determining the long-term success of chemotherapy, a notion that is in line with abundant clinical data indicating that tumor infiltration by cytotoxic T lymphocytes influences disease outcome. [7][8][9][10] Cancer cells respond to some chemotherapeutics such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin by undergoing an immunogenic form of cell death, meaning that such dying cells become able to induce a potent cellular immune response on subcutaneous injection into immunocompetent mice.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The pre-apoptotic exposure of CRT at the cell surface has emerged as an important hallmark of ICD, meaning that it can predict -at least in part -the capacity of dying cells to elicit a protective anticancer immune response, both in rodent models 2,13,14,17,18,33,34 and in patients. [35][36][37] Here, we report the unexpected finding that CRT exposure is regulated not only by cell-intrinsic mechanisms, but also by soluble factors that operate in an autocrine/paracrine manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive ROS are detrimental; therefore, increasing ROS generation and simultaneously attenuating detoxification can kill cancer cells [50].…”
Section: Inhibition Of Antioxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It turned out that the unsuspected ability of doxorubicin (an anthracycline employed for the treatment of various carcinomas) to trigger ICD as a standalone intervention, hence converting dying cancer cells into a vaccine that is efficient in the absence of adjuvants, is shared by a relatively restricted set of lethal triggers. [28][29][30][31][32][33] These include, but perhaps are not limited to, mitoxantrone and epirubicin (2 other anthracyclines currently used in the clinic), [34][35][36][37] bleomycin (a glycopeptide antibiotic endowed with antineoplastic properties), 38 oxaliplatin (a platinum derivative generally employed against colorectal carcinoma), [39][40][41][42] cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent approved for the treatment of neoplastic and autoimmune conditions), [43][44][45][46][47][48] etoposide (a topoisomerase inhibitor currently used for the treatment of several neoplasms) combined with the chemical inhibitor of glycolysis 2-deoxyglucose, 49,50 patupilone (a microtubular inhibitor that has not yet been approved for use in humans), [51][52][53] septacidin (an antifungal antibiotic produced by Streptomyces fibriatus) 54,55 specific forms of radiation therapy, 34,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] photodynamic therapy (a clinically approved antican...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%