2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of phenolic acids and essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No previous studies have reported the antibacterial effect of these phenolic acids and catechin against UPEC; however, similar MICs have been reported for these individual phenolic acids against other bacteria [ 15 , 20 ]. Protocatechuic acid showed an MIC of 19.46 mM against Listeria monocytogenes, and vanillic acid showed MICs of 17.84 and 14.86 mM against E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…No previous studies have reported the antibacterial effect of these phenolic acids and catechin against UPEC; however, similar MICs have been reported for these individual phenolic acids against other bacteria [ 15 , 20 ]. Protocatechuic acid showed an MIC of 19.46 mM against Listeria monocytogenes, and vanillic acid showed MICs of 17.84 and 14.86 mM against E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The observed effect of pH on the log reductions of Listeria cocktails when treated with both tested EOs and Salmonella cocktails when treated with thyme EO agrees with what has been predominantly reported in the literature, that the efficacy of EOs is enhanced at acidic pHs (Perricone et al, 2015). Miyague, Macedo, Meca, Holley, and Luciano (2015) reported that carvacrol improved its antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes at pH 5 in contrast to pHs 6 and 7; Gutierrez et al (2009) observed that either oregano or thyme EO showed better inhibition of growth and extension of the lag phase of L. monocytogenes at pH 5.32 and 5.92, respectively. This behavior has been explained by reasoning that under acidic conditions, carvacrol will be in a molecular state that enables it to enter the bacterial cell (Zhou et al, 2007), mostly undissociated and more hydrophobic; while Juven, Kanner, Schved, and Weisslowicz (1994) explained that in the case of thymol, this in turn would enable the molecule to bind to the hydrophobic parts of proteins and better dissolve in the membrane lipids of the bacterial cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported the effect of plant EOs and extracts against some pathogens, including L. monocytogenes , on food model systems (Boziaris, Proestos, Kapsokefalou, & Komaitis, ; Solomakos, Govaris, Koidis, & Botsoglou, ). In the study of Miyague, Macedo, Meca, Holley, and Luciano, (), carvacrol showed the strongest activity against L. monocytogenes . In contrast, some researchers indicated that carvacrol had no antibacterial effect against L. monocytogenes in steak, likely because of the presence of certain food components (Veldhuizen, Creutzberg, Burt, & Haagsman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%