2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03773-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of sotalol and magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the analysis was restricted to the two RCTs that were judged to have adequately concealed random allocation 16,28 ( Table 2), the intervention effect was no longer statistically significant (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.26, test for overall effect p = 0.40), although heterogeneity was absent (I 2 = 0%) and no longer significant (p = 0.92). A similar pattern was evident when analyses were restricted to the three RCTs whose randomisation procedures were judged to be adequate 15,20,21,29 (Table 2) or the five RCTs whose blinding was considered adequate 13,15,17,18,24,27 (forest plots not shown). Given that the number of studies meeting the criteria of methodological adequacy for these attributes was comparatively low, these results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When the analysis was restricted to the two RCTs that were judged to have adequately concealed random allocation 16,28 ( Table 2), the intervention effect was no longer statistically significant (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.26, test for overall effect p = 0.40), although heterogeneity was absent (I 2 = 0%) and no longer significant (p = 0.92). A similar pattern was evident when analyses were restricted to the three RCTs whose randomisation procedures were judged to be adequate 15,20,21,29 (Table 2) or the five RCTs whose blinding was considered adequate 13,15,17,18,24,27 (forest plots not shown). Given that the number of studies meeting the criteria of methodological adequacy for these attributes was comparatively low, these results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Of these initial 206 papers, 158 were excluded on screening of titles and abstracts and a further 26 were subsequently excluded on screening of the full papers (Appendix 4). The remaining 22 papers that met the inclusion criteria for this review comprised 17 that reported parallel-group RCTs (15 trials altogether) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and five systematic reviews.…”
Section: Quantity and Quality Of Research Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations