Combination of Toric and multifocal intraocular lens implantation in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism

Liang, Jingli; Tian, Fang; Zhang, Hong; Teng, Hui

doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.12.11

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 20 ] The mean power of mutifocal IOLs in present study was 21.4 ± 2.55 D. Liang et al . implanted multifocal IOLs with a mean power of 20.13 ± 2.38 D.[ 17 ] Medeiros et al . implanted TNFT100 and ZXR00/ZMB00 lens with mean power of 22.2 ± 1.5 and 21 ± 2.7 D, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

“…was 0.28 ± 0.12. [ 17 ] The preoperative distance BCVA in the two groups of patients with multifocal IOLs was 0.24 ± 0.18 and 0.16 ± 0.19 in the study by Medeiros et al . [ 11 ] The median BCVA in patients in Chiam et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…was 69.7 ± 9.6 years. [ 17 ] The mean age of patients in the study by Medeiros et al . was 64.2 ± 8.3 and 64.4 ± 7.7 years in the two groups with multifocal IOLs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…observed mean distance BCVA of 0.05 ± 0.05 at 6 months postoperatively. [ 17 ] The contrast-sensitivity score in multifocal IOLs implantation in present study was 1.45 ± 0.3 postoperatively, which was increased compared to the preoperative levels, and this was an apparent increase in CS due to removal of cataractous lens. Liang et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A clinical study to assess feasibility, acceptance, and outcome of multifocal intraocular lens in patients with bilateral immature cataract at a tertiary eye care institute

Deshpande

Mangiraj

Deshpande

et al. 2020

Indian J Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…was 69.7 ± 9.6 years. [ 17 ] The mean age of patients in the study by Medeiros et al . was 64.2 ± 8.3 and 64.4 ± 7.7 years in the two groups with multifocal IOLs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A clinical study to assess feasibility, acceptance, and outcome of multifocal intraocular lens in patients with bilateral immature cataract at a tertiary eye care institute

Deshpande

Mangiraj

Deshpande

et al. 2020

Indian J Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, pseudophakic patients with monofocal implants ultimately need reading glasses to compensate for the loss of ability to see intermediate or near distances. 2 – 7 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Medeiros¹,

Rolim²,

Motta³

et al. 2017

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon Acrysof IQ® PanOptix® TNFT00 (group A), and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus lens, J&J Tecnis Symfony® ZXR00 with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis® ZMB00 (group B).MethodsThis prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive, comparative study included the assessment of 40 eyes in 20 patients implanted with multifocal intraocular lens. Exclusion criteria were existence of any corneal, retina, or optic nerve disease, previous eye surgery, illiteracy, previous refractive surgery, high axial myopia, expected postoperative corneal astigmatism of >1.00 cylindrical diopter (D), and intraoperative or postoperative complications. Binocular visual acuity was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), with the analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS), and visual defocus curve.ResultsPostoperative UDVA was 0.01 and −0.096 logMAR (p<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively; postoperative CDVA was −0.07 and −0.16 logMAR (p<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively; UIVA was 0.14 and 0.20 logMAR (p<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively; UNVA was −0.03 and 0.11 logMAR (p<0.01) in groups A and B, respectively. Under photopic conditions group B had better CS at low frequencies with and without glare.ConclusionBoth groups promoted good quality of vision for long, intermediate, and short distances. Group B exhibited a better performance for very short distances and for intermediate and long distances ≥−1.50 D of vergence. Group A exhibited a better performance for UIVA at 60 cm and for UNVA at 40 cm.

show abstract

Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia

Antonio-Santos

Vedula

Hatt

et al. 2020

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background-Stimulus deprivation amblyopia (SDA) develops due to an obstruction to the passage of light secondary to a condition such as cataract. The obstruction prevents formation of a clear image on the retina. SDA can be resistant to treatment, leading to poor visual prognosis. SDA probably constitutes less than 3% of all amblyopia cases, although precise estimates of prevalence are unknown. In developed countries, most patients present under the age of one year; in less developed parts of the world patients are likely to be older at the time of presentation. The mainstay of treatment is removal of the cataract and then occlusion of the better-seeing eye, but regimens vary, can be difficult to execute, and traditionally are believed to lead to disappointing results. Objectives-Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of occlusion therapy for SDA in an attempt to establish realistic treatment outcomes. Where data were available, we also planned to examine evidence of any dose response effect and to assess the effect of the duration, severity, and causative factor on the size and direction of the treatment effect.

show abstract

Combination of Toric and multifocal intraocular lens implantation in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism

Abstract: Although the combination of Toric and multifocal IOL implantation results in compromising stereoacuity, it can still provide patients with high levels of spectacle freedom and good overall binocular visual acuity.

Cited by 7 publications

References 20 publications

A clinical study to assess feasibility, acceptance, and outcome of multifocal intraocular lens in patients with bilateral immature cataract at a tertiary eye care institute

A clinical study to assess feasibility, acceptance, and outcome of multifocal intraocular lens in patients with bilateral immature cataract at a tertiary eye care institute

Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About